@zathamrodri: #CapCut #somalitiktok #foryoupage #wey fudutahay⚽️

zatham1️⃣6️⃣
zatham1️⃣6️⃣
Open In TikTok:
Region: SO
Tuesday 26 November 2024 11:06:59 GMT
683
60
4
1

Music

Download

Comments

garcadde3
CORNEL :
lixle🖤
2024-11-26 15:47:51
0
apdi957
DUQOW :
Lixle 👀
2024-11-26 13:50:37
0
naaji837
NAJiiß uPdY🔥🤴 :
lixle❤️
2024-11-26 13:19:05
0
mustaf.cali60
Mustaf Cali :
lcipw
2024-11-26 11:25:49
0
To see more videos from user @zathamrodri, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

“‘Hit the Security First!’ 😳 Wack 100 Says Jim Jones Should have a RICO — Loon Calls Cap” Wack 100 and Big Loon go head-to-head over Jim Jones, Tekashi 6ix9ine, Mel Murda and the infamous Nine Trey wiretap. Wack argues Jim Jones should’ve faced a federal conspiracy charge based on a recorded call (played during the 2019 Nine Trey trial) where a voice attributed to Jim Jones and Jamel “Mel Murda” Jones discussed how to “violate” 6ix9ine by targeting his security. Loon pushes back, saying a phone call alone doesn’t equal an indictment, and notes Jim Jones was never charged even after 6ix9ine testified Jim was a Nine Trey member in court. The two also debate the internet narrative that Jim was an “unindicted co-conspirator,” the legal threshold for federal conspiracy, and Loon’s hypothetical: if conversations alone were enough, a lot of people (including Wack) would be in trouble for calls with people who later caught cases. We break down: 	•	What the wiretap actually said and why prosecutors may not have charged Jim Jones. 	•	6ix9ine’s testimony naming Jim Jones as Nine Trey, and how that played in court.  	•	What “unindicted co-conspirator” means online vs what’s documented. (JJ has not been charged.)  	•	Wack 100’s position that the feds had enough vs Loon’s rebuttal on evidentiary standards. 	•	The broader question: Do media + internet narratives replace actual indictments? All claims in this discussion are opinions from the speakers. We present context + sources and encourage viewers to read the reporting and think critically. Great conversation with @_the100show  #jimjones #wack100 #tekashi6ix9ine #tekashi #bigloon
“‘Hit the Security First!’ 😳 Wack 100 Says Jim Jones Should have a RICO — Loon Calls Cap” Wack 100 and Big Loon go head-to-head over Jim Jones, Tekashi 6ix9ine, Mel Murda and the infamous Nine Trey wiretap. Wack argues Jim Jones should’ve faced a federal conspiracy charge based on a recorded call (played during the 2019 Nine Trey trial) where a voice attributed to Jim Jones and Jamel “Mel Murda” Jones discussed how to “violate” 6ix9ine by targeting his security. Loon pushes back, saying a phone call alone doesn’t equal an indictment, and notes Jim Jones was never charged even after 6ix9ine testified Jim was a Nine Trey member in court. The two also debate the internet narrative that Jim was an “unindicted co-conspirator,” the legal threshold for federal conspiracy, and Loon’s hypothetical: if conversations alone were enough, a lot of people (including Wack) would be in trouble for calls with people who later caught cases. We break down: • What the wiretap actually said and why prosecutors may not have charged Jim Jones. • 6ix9ine’s testimony naming Jim Jones as Nine Trey, and how that played in court. • What “unindicted co-conspirator” means online vs what’s documented. (JJ has not been charged.) • Wack 100’s position that the feds had enough vs Loon’s rebuttal on evidentiary standards. • The broader question: Do media + internet narratives replace actual indictments? All claims in this discussion are opinions from the speakers. We present context + sources and encourage viewers to read the reporting and think critically. Great conversation with @_the100show #jimjones #wack100 #tekashi6ix9ine #tekashi #bigloon

About