@alfredorosales33: Pinchi agripino!!! #francoescamilla #risas #risastiktok #comediante #humor #humor2020

Alfredo Rosales - Realtor
Alfredo Rosales - Realtor
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Monday 17 August 2020 21:13:02 GMT
1689
60
0
1

Music

Download

Comments

There are no more comments for this video.
To see more videos from user @alfredorosales33, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

↓↓ The prompt                    **Prompt:**
↓↓ The prompt **Prompt:** "I am writing the methods section for my systematic review on [insert topic]. Help me structure and detail this section, ensuring that it meets the highest standards of clarity, transparency, and reproducibility. Please guide me through the following key components to include: 1. **Review Protocol:** - Describe the pre-specified protocol for the systematic review, including whether it was registered in a public database (e.g., PROSPERO). - Outline the rationale for conducting the systematic review on this topic. 2. **Eligibility Criteria:** - Define the inclusion and exclusion criteria for studies (e.g., population, interventions, comparators, outcomes, and study designs – commonly known as PICO). - Specify the language restrictions (if any), time frame, and publication types (e.g., peer-reviewed articles, conference papers, theses, etc.). 3. **Information Sources:** - List the databases and other information sources (e.g., PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Google Scholar, grey literature) that will be searched. - Include the date range for the literature search and specify any other sources of unpublished data, if applicable. 4. **Search Strategy:** - Provide details of the search strategy, including keywords, Boolean operators, and specific search terms used to identify relevant studies. - Mention how the search was designed and whether any filters (e.g., study design, date) were applied. 5. **Study Selection Process:** - Describe how studies will be selected for inclusion, including the process for screening, reviewing, and deciding whether studies meet eligibility criteria. - Mention the number of reviewers involved in this process and the approach for resolving disagreements (e.g., consensus, third reviewer). 6. **Data Extraction:** - Explain how data will be extracted from the selected studies (e.g., using a standardized form or data extraction table). - Specify what data will be collected (e.g., study characteristics, participant demographics, interventions, outcomes). 7. **Quality Assessment:** - Describe the methods for assessing the quality or risk of bias of the included studies (e.g., using tools like the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, GRADE). - Specify whether this will be performed by a single reviewer or multiple reviewers, and how disagreements will be resolved. 8. **Data Synthesis and Analysis:** - Outline the methods for synthesizing the data (qualitative or quantitative) from the included studies. - For quantitative reviews, describe the statistical methods, including meta-analysis if applicable (e.g., fixed-effects or random-effects models, statistical tests). - For qualitative reviews, explain how the thematic synthesis or other methods will be applied to summarize the findings. 9. **Sensitivity and Subgroup Analysis (if applicable):** - Discuss any planned sensitivity or subgroup analyses (e.g., by study quality, specific interventions, patient demographics). - Explain how heterogeneity will be assessed and addressed (e.g., I² statistic, subgroup comparisons). 10. **Assessment of Publication Bias (if applicable):** - Describe the methods used to assess publication bias, such as funnel plots or statistical tests like Egger's test. 11. **Ethics and Dissemination:** - Clarify whether ethical approval is needed for the systematic review (generally, systematic reviews do not require ethical approval). - Briefly mention how the findings will be disseminated (e.g., publication in a peer-reviewed journal, presentation at conferences). Please ensure that this section is detailed, well-organized, and includes all necessary information to make the systematic review transparent and reproducible."

About