@lisaremillard: #14thamendment #january6 #trump2024 Colorado judge jusf ruled former President Trump engaged in insurrection but that doesnt mean he violated the 14th Amendment. His name can still appear on the Colorado primary ballot.

📺The News Girl 📰
📺The News Girl 📰
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Saturday 18 November 2023 02:32:17 GMT
561731
36214
1538
602

Music

Download

Comments

donovansimison3
poptartaddict87 :
😂 Colorado is corrupt. He clearly didn’t. Doesn’t matter Colorado always been blue since carter
2023-11-19 03:39:57
371
beachgoer2997
beaching it up :
hated the man in 2016, the last 7 years of non stop attacks has turned me into a die hard Trumper.
2023-11-18 03:09:44
84
saltydog2231
SaltyDog2231 :
Shocker, Colorado 🙄🙄 maybe that judge should watch the video surveillance of that day
2023-11-18 14:39:35
385
loftingjive
Gen-X :
Eliminate him from blue states, he will still win! Doesn’t need them, there are so few! 😂
2023-11-18 02:57:40
2
garrett_inc
tgarrett85 :
So what you mean to say is, Judge gave her opinion but has no facts to back up her claims and make a ruling so could bar him from being on the ballot?
2023-11-21 16:37:48
1
laziabella
laziabella :
They are so scared of Trump! They will never stop talking abt him.He made history.
2023-11-21 02:22:26
2
63tomskids
Tommy :
So, the Judges ruling is nothing but an opinion… 😳
2023-11-19 05:41:35
2
shawnking911
Shawn King911 :
michigan! The land of embezzlement 🤣
2023-11-18 04:11:36
2
deweyesweetjr
deweyesweetjr :
basically we'll need an amendment that'll say that no persons that have engaged in insurrection, sedition, or treason shall be eligible to hold (1)
2023-11-21 10:49:38
1
megamiles1729
Mega1729 :
Doesn’t “or hold any office” effectively mean a blanket term and could be thought of as the author's way of making it apply to any offices
2023-11-19 19:39:00
1
skylarsolaren
skylarsolaren :
Unfortunately, that is a legit interpretation of the text. Major oversight in writing the amendment.
2023-11-18 18:16:00
1
mdaesq
mdaesq :
As a lawyer, I agree with this reading. There’s an interpretive cannon called “expressio unius.” It means the express mention of one thing —
2023-11-27 13:50:53
0
welldontblameme
welldontblameme :
They didn’t say president, but they can’t name every officer, just examples. I think you have to look at the intent of the law. The intent is clear.
2023-11-19 06:28:05
4
jameswmc7
JamesWMc777 :
Such a worthless, partisan judge
2023-11-18 21:21:23
4
emperorofmankind8
emperorofmankind8 :
isnt the president Automatically "commander in cheif"? is that not millitary?
2023-11-18 12:28:16
4
chevypride68
William Brathor :
😂😂😂😂😂
2023-11-20 23:14:47
3
raulrascon866
raulrascon866 :
😳😳😳
2023-11-20 17:03:13
3
the.man936
the man :
😂😂
2023-11-20 12:37:55
3
faleshadawn
Falesha :
How did we know this would happen? The blatant corruption is absolutely disgusting.
2023-11-20 10:42:58
3
calebsmith3815
Caleb smith :
Wouldn’t this be a violation of the double jeopardy clause since this has came up previously to the supreme court
2023-11-20 05:24:30
3
livelaughdie7
Livelaughdie :
The MAGATS that think he’s going to be president again are severely DELUSIONAL
2023-11-20 03:50:18
3
eiredi
eiredi :
ffs
2023-11-20 01:41:34
3
anyrubik
Anyrubik :
These people will be remember in history for not putting a stop on the guy who destroy the country for good
2023-11-20 00:01:01
3
justwonderingg
DoingMyBest :
Time to amend the 14th to add that in 😮‍💨
2023-11-19 18:51:26
3
To see more videos from user @lisaremillard, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos


About