@aneth_xhpp: Bajo la luna y las estrellas...˚。୧⋆★ #viral #paratii #fyp #spotify #musica #amorsincero #alfondohaysitio #afhs #fouryoupage #lyric #lyrics_songs #rolitas #rolitaschidas #dedicar #amor #indirectas #estado #peru

aneth.
aneth.
Open In TikTok:
Region: PE
Thursday 20 June 2024 22:20:02 GMT
265872
31908
123
1878

Music

Download

Comments

royu1wn
annie :
BAJO LA LUNA Y LAS ESTRELLAS (sigan)
2024-06-21 20:39:21
192
deescire
Luana :
te entiendo Andrea 🫠
2024-06-21 06:14:31
247
heenjz_
heen :
es raro que siendo hombre me identifique cierto?
2024-08-14 10:37:09
0
colorcyn1jg
🪷 LA PECAS 🪷 :
cual es el nombre de la canción pq no me sale en mi Spotify hackeado 🙃
2024-06-22 06:21:55
31
leidyy.bloog1
Gersayess ✨ :
TEMAZOOO 🗣️‼️‼️‼️
2024-06-22 05:00:55
65
chuyyyyy19
Gladys Martinez :
está canción tiene nombre y apellido 🥀
2025-10-01 04:20:39
1
nicx_.laz13
N :
Joel no merecía a Andrea 😭
2025-05-26 21:17:52
0
felipecusi6
zskylarz :
joel y Andrea ❤️
2024-08-30 22:02:59
0
lalalamrs
M🩷 :
lo extraño 😔
2024-08-13 23:09:34
2
gaby.2123_t
Gaby :
yo y las que fuimos 2da opción cuando:
2024-08-12 19:50:23
0
davao1142
Miguel :
:"v un sentimiento las canciones de afhs
2024-06-22 14:57:00
16
divol215
. :
en la vida soy Andrea 😿
2025-07-30 04:00:45
0
soyalguien_171
𝓛𝓲𝓭𝓲𝓪 ٭ :
" A " 😭
2024-08-11 02:22:52
0
jas84_0
JAS?! • siguiendo :
No quiero perder a mi mejor amigo pero yo digo que ya no le importo
2024-07-24 11:11:21
0
lovesdrac0o_
🍃 :
su ex se llama lucero y siempre q escucho esta kansion y acuerdo d ella JAJAJAJ😢😢😢😢
2024-11-29 03:01:45
1
lainvxz
Lynen :
La canción de Andrea 😭
2024-07-31 18:26:52
1
zombi1.30
zombi (JOEL) 🚫 :
yo siendo joel
2024-09-15 13:16:29
0
jeykey_2824.7
🎀★KooKie★🎀 :
No me puedo identificar tanto con una canción😭😭😭
2025-04-16 00:47:34
0
momo_de_twice6403
momo_de_twice6403 :
en el amor soy andrea
2024-07-19 23:11:12
0
tmdani17__
Danni🕷 :
aaaaaa 🥺🥺🥺
2024-11-17 12:36:43
1
emelyyyy77
emisita :
MI CANCION 😭😭😭
2024-06-25 16:49:12
3
im_danae_xy
Danae :
a mí y a Andrea nos causaron el mismo dolor 😔👍
2024-09-18 21:35:52
1
zulkixy
zul :
NO DESESPERES
2024-06-22 04:58:11
7
isaxmoon_
Isa's_ :
siempre temazo nunca indirecta.
2025-04-18 05:22:35
5
ghisel.marca
Cris ❤️‍🩹🙃 :
Bajo la luna y las estrellas 💫
2024-09-18 03:40:03
3
To see more videos from user @aneth_xhpp, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

It’s becoming clearer by the day that President Cyril Ramaphosa’s decision to place Minister of Police Senzo Mchunu on special leave was not merely an administrative step, but a calculated political maneuver — one that now appears to be backfiring spectacularly. At first glance, many assumed the President was protecting his minister. But if you look closely, it seems the move was less about protection and more about self-preservation. By sending Mchunu on special leave instead of dismissing him, Ramaphosa effectively created distance between himself and the controversy brewing within the SAPS, while projecting an image of “allowing due process” to unfold. Yet, as the ad hoc committee hearings progress, it’s becoming increasingly clear that Mchunu is being left to carry the full weight of accountability. The revelations surfacing in the committee are painting a damning picture — not only about the management of the police service but also about the deeper systemic failures that extend right up to the Union Buildings. In the public eye, it now looks as if Mchunu has been thrown under the bus, left alone to answer for decisions and dynamics that were likely sanctioned, or at least known, at the highest level. In political circles, this kind of “strategic distancing” is not new. Often, when a minister becomes politically inconvenient or when allegations start cutting too close to the president’s own authority, the standard response is to “temporarily relieve” that individual — giving the illusion of fairness while quietly isolating the political damage. However, this time it seems that the plan is backfiring. Instead of shielding the presidency, the ad hoc committee’s open sessions are exposing uncomfortable truths that implicate not just the minister, but also the broader executive chain of command. The optics are terrible: it now looks as though the President was willing to sacrifice one of his own to maintain a clean image — but in doing so, he might have opened a door that leads directly back to his own office. If anything, Senzo Mchunu’s predicament highlights the fragile loyalty and high-stakes power games within the ruling party. Those once seen as trusted lieutenants can quickly become political liabilities, and the same system that elevates them can just as easily discard them when the tide turns. Whether Mchunu’s special leave turns into a permanent exit or a dramatic political comeback remains to be seen — but one thing is certain: the longer these hearings continue, the more South Africans are realizing that what was meant to be a “protective measure” for the president might have turned into a political boomerang.
It’s becoming clearer by the day that President Cyril Ramaphosa’s decision to place Minister of Police Senzo Mchunu on special leave was not merely an administrative step, but a calculated political maneuver — one that now appears to be backfiring spectacularly. At first glance, many assumed the President was protecting his minister. But if you look closely, it seems the move was less about protection and more about self-preservation. By sending Mchunu on special leave instead of dismissing him, Ramaphosa effectively created distance between himself and the controversy brewing within the SAPS, while projecting an image of “allowing due process” to unfold. Yet, as the ad hoc committee hearings progress, it’s becoming increasingly clear that Mchunu is being left to carry the full weight of accountability. The revelations surfacing in the committee are painting a damning picture — not only about the management of the police service but also about the deeper systemic failures that extend right up to the Union Buildings. In the public eye, it now looks as if Mchunu has been thrown under the bus, left alone to answer for decisions and dynamics that were likely sanctioned, or at least known, at the highest level. In political circles, this kind of “strategic distancing” is not new. Often, when a minister becomes politically inconvenient or when allegations start cutting too close to the president’s own authority, the standard response is to “temporarily relieve” that individual — giving the illusion of fairness while quietly isolating the political damage. However, this time it seems that the plan is backfiring. Instead of shielding the presidency, the ad hoc committee’s open sessions are exposing uncomfortable truths that implicate not just the minister, but also the broader executive chain of command. The optics are terrible: it now looks as though the President was willing to sacrifice one of his own to maintain a clean image — but in doing so, he might have opened a door that leads directly back to his own office. If anything, Senzo Mchunu’s predicament highlights the fragile loyalty and high-stakes power games within the ruling party. Those once seen as trusted lieutenants can quickly become political liabilities, and the same system that elevates them can just as easily discard them when the tide turns. Whether Mchunu’s special leave turns into a permanent exit or a dramatic political comeback remains to be seen — but one thing is certain: the longer these hearings continue, the more South Africans are realizing that what was meant to be a “protective measure” for the president might have turned into a political boomerang.

About