📺The News Girl 📰
Region: US
Friday 21 June 2024 16:28:58 GMT
807639
49967
1144
1581
Music
Download
Comments
Kilroy 214 :
This is very surprising with this court
2024-06-21 16:36:15
2483
Megan Bryant :
THIS is news. Thank you ❤️
2024-06-21 17:32:55
508
Jonathan Prior450 :
I’m torn on this one
2024-06-22 02:29:37
15
Austin :
So does this mean anything in terms of felons..? In certain cases..?
2024-06-22 03:33:25
25
Mr. Cellophane :
It's almost as if the document is supposed to be a living representation of the times, and not some immutable holy text.
2024-06-21 18:50:40
82
🐓 𝒞𝑒𝓁𝒾𝓃𝒶💚🏳️🌈 :
Good! This is one step in providing solutions to unnecessary violence
2024-06-21 18:14:17
28
Zoobie :
The real issue is that a civil domestic violence case can remove second amendment rights without due process.
2024-06-21 23:19:36
11
Dem :
love the phrase used "not only women but other people" .....like women aren't people.... 😑
2024-06-22 18:21:40
6
Sandt :
A right wing Supreme Court did something good regarding gun laws?!?
2024-06-21 19:29:53
1997
Isingbcuz :
Thomas is right in my opinion. Do I like the idea of Rahimi having a weapon of any kind? No. But I personally wouldn’t trade liberty for security ever.
2024-06-21 17:12:39
333
The Lazarz Project :
That means that the supreme court is no longer serving the people and protecting the constitution if they are attempting to circumvent it.
2024-06-21 18:19:33
259
Jeff Bass :
Why is there always one? (and in the Supreme Court’s case it’s the same one)
2024-06-21 22:49:17
61
S.D :
Remove them from DT possession.
2024-06-23 03:48:41
7
Michael Lucky Lucky :
I guess it’s the sound of the name that got this court to order this way🤔🤔🤔🤔
2024-06-22 03:50:32
6
Mrtonio98 :
I'm okay with background checks and barring domestic abusers, SO, and violent offenders from owing firearms but anything else is unconstitutional
2024-07-11 18:20:50
5
Duffman :
gun control only works on people that actually follow the law haha. It's easy for criminals to get a gun. thus dies absolutely nothing. I see it every day as a cop. felons always have a way.
2024-06-24 14:04:01
5
John Lee :
That mean is okay to kill anyone because of the supreme law
2024-06-24 05:32:56
5
Jonathan Jordan783 :
That fact that the Supreme Court is coming out saying yeah this problem shouldn’t of ever happened in the first place and basically calls the 5th court idiots goes to show American politics for the
2024-06-21 18:10:51
279
z.knorf :
when i heard 8-1 i already knew who dissented 😭💀
2024-06-21 16:44:27
260
usborderpawpatrol :
Of course clarence thomas dissented
2024-06-22 01:43:00
133
harrison3680 :
Thank you for your great news coverage of events
2024-06-21 16:33:31
97
Old Gravy 💙💙💙🩵🩵🩵 :
Thomas dissented? 🤔 you don't say.
2024-06-21 16:42:59
92
Mary :
I’m shocked they came to the correct conclusion. Of course Thomas dissented. He needs to go!
2024-06-21 16:44:41
84
Brandon Lee :
GOOD JOB SCOTUS! THANK YOU TYYY
2024-06-21 19:38:48
75
jakewalkerful :
I am a staunch 2A supporter and I agree with this
2024-06-21 17:21:40
67
Old Gravy 💙💙💙🩵🩵🩵 :
Common sense gun laws 🤔 you don't say?
2024-06-21 16:42:01
41
FUBAR ༽ :
It makes sense, but if judges don’t understand things set in place, like the bruens test, maybe more guidance should be given when they’re established…and some kind of constant training for judges.
2024-06-22 06:36:39
33
simon24345 :
Claris Cliff should be kicked off the supreme Court. He is corrupt as hell!
2024-06-21 19:48:17
28
jamesdanielgarza :
Of course, CT continues to except bribes.
2024-06-21 16:42:08
28
Jay Talon :
Good! Demonstrably violent people shouldn’t be able to legally own firearms.
2024-06-21 16:44:19
26
WhitRvrAnimalRescue :
On brand for Thomas🥴
2024-06-21 17:03:13
19
tootall9599 :
this is the exact type of person who needs his 2nd admemendt taken away. I am a huge 2nd admemendt advocate n gun owner. totally agree with this Decision
2024-06-21 16:55:23
18
Xanderishome :
I am shocked in the best of ways.
2024-06-21 17:11:24
15
worldpolice93 :
the problem is that it is (and absolutely should be) possible to get a restraining order with no evidence. it should be very easy to get a restraining order but not very easy to take someone's rights.
2024-06-23 12:37:54
13
thumbtack :
@Matt Burd
2024-06-21 17:49:59
13
CGK :
we already have a ton of laws to cover just about anything that can happen.
2024-06-23 22:27:59
12
Brett Burns :
thank you for being so good at what you do!
2024-06-21 17:15:38
12
Mark Henry5275 :
Does this include the police having fully automatic weapons and military equipment?
2024-06-23 20:45:55
10
Yuca Senpai :
❤️yes!
2024-06-21 19:54:10
10
🛡Dale@milehigh-5280⚔️ :
Absolutely 💯 👍
2024-06-21 17:59:29
10
JOE92ROCKS :
Good not everyone should be able to own a gun
2024-06-21 17:23:08
10
December Moon :
Ofc Clarence would dissent on this. F that dude.
2024-06-21 16:45:24
10
bluejay0181 :
Give them an inch and they'll take all our rights.
2024-06-21 16:40:58
10
Joe Chamberlain962 :
Maybe common sense would be if an individual is found to be a violent risk to the public then they shouldn't be released to the public.
2024-06-22 12:19:48
9
CSmith :
Hopefully Thomas is wicked pissed over being steamrolled and resigns.
2024-06-21 22:02:18
9
To see more videos from user @lisaremillard, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
