I’d assume they melt it down and reform glass bottles
2024-08-18 00:51:41
39
Midwest Xennial :
When we had glass pop bottles we returned them to the store. Then the same truck that delivered full bottles to sell, took the empties with them back to the filling plant. Truck was already going there, just some extra weight. Offset by less garbage in the garbage truck going to landfill
2024-08-18 02:43:15
10
user6493623880825 :
It’s not feasible. When you consider the lifecycle management costs of glass vs single use plastics, it’s not feasible. But it does make people feel better even though it uses much more fossil fuels
2024-08-18 05:07:05
7
TomCatWilliams :
Why don’t you just refill it?
2024-08-27 10:13:33
3
Badcowboy :
Back in the 70s and before - every town had a bottling plant. You just took them back there and dropped them off.
2024-08-19 13:20:39
3
user122304 :
You spend more on "reusable"/"refillable" bottle on the front end, and the profit comes from the vast majority of those bottles that don't get returned or enter the regular recycling stream
2024-08-18 00:03:01
3
jayehmsee :
trying to throw pops off? 😛
2024-08-20 00:37:11
2
joey :
I think in some places you pay a deposit when purchasing and if you take the bottles to a location you get the deposit back based on bottles return . So you will take deposits coupon toward more h2o
2024-08-19 10:03:46
1
Jahred Tahara :
The system is low loss on a material level. Any low loss system can be made highly efficient over time.
2024-08-18 10:37:33
1
Raz :
There is study for reusable cup.. which requires it to be used 20-100 times for breakeven in terms of environmental impact
2024-08-18 00:14:20
1
KittyCrazies&Crafts :
Its probably been closed for 25 years but this reminds me of the soda bottler. They had a route mostly convenience stores and pizza places. They dropped of full ones and picked up the empties
2024-08-18 00:03:13
1
Ruhi Celik :
I’m an engineer in the plastic bottling industry. You’re correct, glass is not economically viable mainly due to the high energy consumption to produce it, ironically making it unenviromental.
2024-09-02 03:41:33
0
Couch2ironman :
Almost like we should just run it through pipelines to your house
2024-08-30 11:49:33
0
annaboo :
Economics and env science major: it’s a net 0. It costs as much to make as it does to offset plastic waste. But that net 0 is still better than costing the env more than it does to make (plastics).
2024-08-29 17:09:59
0
lealtheseal :
bass bottles being reused in any way is better for the environment, cost efficient negative, this is why getting glass bottles of milk is more expensive because of the cleaning process and shipping co
2024-08-29 14:58:32
0
. :
Recycling is a scam
2024-08-29 06:22:06
0
sillyrabbit5836 :
Pigeons bro, pigeons 😂
2024-08-28 01:12:57
0
bimbo.the.cat :
it all gets trashed .. just gimmick cody
2024-08-27 23:36:03
0
Kevin :
Sadly, you have to pick economics OR environment, you don’t get both, at least not at this point
2024-08-27 17:28:59
0
Ran Burgundy :
That’s a very good point
2024-08-27 17:20:18
0
Productivehamsterwheel :
Aesthetics. We seem to forget that bottled water is a luxury item when compared to tab water and filtered well water.
2024-08-27 11:03:30
0
Digital Kalakaar :
Does it cost more than the plastic bottles? Yes. Them both are same economics wise. No difference. Just the sales will be more as people will be attracted to no plastic bottles now.
2024-08-27 04:43:11
0
Impenitent :
government rebates for companies who recycle
2024-08-26 21:32:07
0
Matt :
From a financial and resource consumption perspective, single use is better which is why we moved in that direction. From a health and reusability perspective, glass is better. Pick your poison.
2024-08-26 21:07:07
0
To see more videos from user @atlcody, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.