1. Home
  2. Detail

@nagidollayevnaa: #fyp

жануля🇰🇿
жануля🇰🇿
Open In TikTok:
Region: KZ
Saturday 11 January 2025 13:08:09 GMT
1799771
144999
2116
28237

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (1.15MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (1.15MB) Watermark .mp4 (2.11MB) Music .mp3

Comments

crocodile.kz07
Crocodile.QZR :
Даже 1 лям не стоит біреуі
2025-01-11 16:59:34
246
k_aissnt
ais :
ӘКЕ ШЕШЕМІЗДІ МЕККЕГЕ АПАРУ БҰЙЫРСЫН!
2025-01-12 04:06:05
1424
gennadgolovkin
@gennadgolovkin :
win win жағдай ғой 😅
2025-01-12 15:40:11
0
shymkent094
👵🏻 :
ол акшага лайк емессндерго(
2025-01-11 19:24:43
27
erkuat0vv
🤞🏻 :
40 лямга 2 еуынды алайн?😁
2025-01-11 17:07:42
696
snbx111
SAYAN🇰🇬 :
20 млн тенге мало же
2025-01-11 19:21:06
39
maksatulyy.17
👻 :
Көк тегі кыз адемы леу ма 🔥😍
2025-01-11 19:24:53
199
e.really05
Era :
Сенін орнына мерс алып алмаймынба
2025-01-11 17:20:38
25
bslymkaaa_1
balymm :
Лайық болсандар аладыда😂
2025-01-12 13:09:26
0
erkem976
ioko :
Екыншы кызга ыздеу салам
2025-01-11 18:58:31
2
nurdaulet_iklasov
nurdaulet :
акшана сатыла бередима калай
2025-01-11 15:15:11
6
aiavxv_07
𝒶𝒾𝒶𝓇𝓊𝓊 :
Как вам моя сторис
2025-01-11 17:13:03
60
amirzhanovv.7
baga ☪︎🙎🏻‍♂️ :
Запроста жаткан улмынгой
2025-01-11 15:01:41
65
arystanova.kz
𝑳𝒂𝒖𝑹𝒂 🦢 :
Анеля екеуын уксатам всегда баргой😍
2025-01-11 16:45:14
8
777.ahmetovv
777.ahmetovv :
мен 20млн га быр машина, екы катын аламгой
2025-01-11 17:32:08
7
sultankul0
bekarys :
2млн десен мейлі 20млн отырык енді
2025-01-11 13:47:20
32
japonka10
JaPoNkA🪭 :
20лямға не келед ?🤨
2025-01-12 09:22:10
2
blackboicarti0969
228 :
Батыска калын мал жоккой😔
2025-01-11 14:28:58
4
maksatovaa.kausarr
каусар :
Кой калвн малга 20лям азгой 30,40па беруы кереккой🤣
2025-01-11 16:36:54
544
azharrxxqww
🤍 :
Кароче маган скучно аваларынды багалайм 🧑🏿-меняй ☁️-не очень 🎃-прикольно 🫦-топ 😍-ВАУУУУУУ 🛐-отдай мне пж
2025-01-11 16:56:52
5
1nzh_2
𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗄𝗂𝖼𝗁𝗈𝗇💤💚 :
калын мал деген нееее
2025-01-12 15:42:39
0
a1aru.ru_7
_a1aru.ru_7 :
Когда у одного фигура Кайли а у одного фигура Кендалла деген осы ғой 🔥🔥
2025-01-11 17:31:57
238
used1234509876
a.qumargalii :
Как вам моя сторис
2025-01-11 18:22:49
1
amirhanuuuu
012 :
2 уыне 50🍋 береин ехала ма 🤣😘
2025-01-12 18:01:50
1
To see more videos from user @nagidollayevnaa, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

#تـــركـــيِ
#تـــركـــيِ
Es lo único que quedaaa.
Es lo único que quedaaa.
мега крутые гифачки в тгк - макотка приколист #fyp #bleach #bleachbravesouls
мега крутые гифачки в тгк - макотка приколист #fyp #bleach #bleachbravesouls
In a room full of celebrities, who would you run to?🥹♥️ For me, Perrie 🥰 #overlays #overlay #edit #editor #freeoverlay #ovrlys4u #sombr @sombr
In a room full of celebrities, who would you run to?🥹♥️ For me, Perrie 🥰 #overlays #overlay #edit #editor #freeoverlay #ovrlys4u #sombr @sombr
Windows/Pc Tricks #fyp #techtok #pctricks #pctips
Windows/Pc Tricks #fyp #techtok #pctricks #pctips
A new report released yesterday by the Department of Energy purports to provide “a critical assessment of the conventional narrative on climate change.” But nine scientists across several different disciplines told WIRED that the report mishandled citations of their work: by cherrypicking data, misrepresenting findings, drawing erroneous conclusions, or leaving out relevant context. This report was introduced on the same day that the EPA announced it would seek to roll back the endangerment finding, a crucial 2009 ruling that provides the scientific and legal basis for the agency to regulate greenhouse gasses under the Clean Air Act. In its draft reconsideration of the finding, the EPA cites the paper from the DOE as part of a review of “the most recently available science” that it undertook to challenge the validity of the 2009 ruling. “The goal is to restore confidence in science, in data, in rationalism. That’s what enabled the creation of modern science,” DOE Secretary Chris Wright said in an Fox interview Tuesday with EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, to celebrate what Zeldin called “the largest deregulatory action in the history of the United States.” The report was authored by four scientists and one economist who are familiar contrarians in the climate science world. Three of the report’s authors were recently hired at the Energy Department, the New York Times reported earlier this month, prompting alarm among mainstream scientists who have long followed their work. Each author has a long history of producing work that challenges mainstream consensus on climate science. Their work is often promoted by interests seeking to discredit scientific findings or downplay climate action. The DOE report’s summary states that it finds “[CO2]-induced warming appears to be less damaging economically than commonly believed, and that aggressive mitigation strategies could be more harmful than beneficial.” Many of the arguments reflected in the new DOE paper, mainstream scientists told WIRED, have been debunked over and over for years.
A new report released yesterday by the Department of Energy purports to provide “a critical assessment of the conventional narrative on climate change.” But nine scientists across several different disciplines told WIRED that the report mishandled citations of their work: by cherrypicking data, misrepresenting findings, drawing erroneous conclusions, or leaving out relevant context. This report was introduced on the same day that the EPA announced it would seek to roll back the endangerment finding, a crucial 2009 ruling that provides the scientific and legal basis for the agency to regulate greenhouse gasses under the Clean Air Act. In its draft reconsideration of the finding, the EPA cites the paper from the DOE as part of a review of “the most recently available science” that it undertook to challenge the validity of the 2009 ruling. “The goal is to restore confidence in science, in data, in rationalism. That’s what enabled the creation of modern science,” DOE Secretary Chris Wright said in an Fox interview Tuesday with EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, to celebrate what Zeldin called “the largest deregulatory action in the history of the United States.” The report was authored by four scientists and one economist who are familiar contrarians in the climate science world. Three of the report’s authors were recently hired at the Energy Department, the New York Times reported earlier this month, prompting alarm among mainstream scientists who have long followed their work. Each author has a long history of producing work that challenges mainstream consensus on climate science. Their work is often promoted by interests seeking to discredit scientific findings or downplay climate action. The DOE report’s summary states that it finds “[CO2]-induced warming appears to be less damaging economically than commonly believed, and that aggressive mitigation strategies could be more harmful than beneficial.” Many of the arguments reflected in the new DOE paper, mainstream scientists told WIRED, have been debunked over and over for years.

About

Legal