@only_sabriii: anime gemelle #011 #🥰 @giu

bribri
bribri
Open In TikTok:
Region: IT
Saturday 15 March 2025 13:18:13 GMT
3673
208
2
13

Music

Download

Comments

_bianca.lopez_
biancaa :
vi amo
2025-03-17 12:48:20
1
quincheantonio
Tony mouse :
💐💐💐
2025-03-15 16:07:29
1
sasaalex3
Alex. sasa :
🌹🌹
2025-04-04 02:55:09
0
To see more videos from user @only_sabriii, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

**To:** Planning & Zoning Department City Hall, 2nd Floor 302 W Reynolds Street Plant City, FL 33563 Email: [planning@plantcitygov.com](mailto:planning@plantcitygov.com) **Subject:** Objection to Rezoning Application PB-2024-49 – Proposed 38-Unit Multi-Family Development on South Walker Street **Date:** \[Insert Today’s Date] Dear Planning & Zoning Department, I am writing as an adjacent property owner and concerned resident to formally object to Rezoning Application **PB-2024-49**, which proposes to rezone approximately 3.19 acres from R-1A Single-Family Dwelling District to Planned Development (PD) to allow for the construction of a **38-unit multi-family apartment complex** on **South Walker Street**, between **West Bates Street and West Grant Street**. ### **Objections:** 1. **Incompatible with Neighborhood Character**    This is a well-established, quiet **single-family residential neighborhood** with narrow roadways and historic character. The proposed apartment complex is completely **incompatible** with the existing land use and would drastically alter the character and integrity of the community. 2. **Infrastructure Inadequacies**    Our existing roadways cannot accommodate the expected **increase in traffic** from a 38-unit development. South Walker Street is already narrow—**two mid-size vehicles cannot pass without one pulling over**. This raises serious safety and emergency access concerns. There are **no current plans to widen these roads**, which would require **encroachment onto existing private property**, raising additional legal and ethical concerns. 3. **Drainage and Flooding Concerns**    **Flooding is already a major issue** in this area during heavy rains. The removal of existing trees has only worsened this problem. Replacing greenspace with pavement and buildings will exacerbate stormwater runoff and **increase the flood risk** for surrounding homes. 4. **Environmental Impact**    The area was previously **wooded**, providing natural drainage, shade, and a buffer between homes. All those trees have already been removed, and the proposed development will introduce more impervious surfaces, contributing to heat island effects and environmental degradation. 5. **Noise and Privacy Invasion**    Placing a dense apartment complex—including a **dog park—directly between two single-family homes** is a direct intrusion on the **peace, quiet, and privacy** that existing homeowners are entitled to expect. This design does not respect the rights of the adjacent residents. 6. **Overdevelopment Concerns**    Plant City has seen a rapid increase in development, often without proper assessment of long-term impacts. This proposal represents **overbuilding** in an area that was never intended to sustain multi-family density. Residents are deeply concerned about the **cumulative impact** of such decisions. --- ### **Request:** I respectfully urge the Planning Board and City Officials to **deny Application PB-2024-49**. If development must occur, it should be limited to **low-density, single-family homes** in keeping with the neighborhood’s zoning and infrastructure capacity. The proposed plan is excessive, invasive, and detrimental to the safety, character, and environment of the community. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please ensure this objection is entered into the public record ahead of the scheduled hearing on **July 23, 2025, at 8:30 AM**. Sincerely, \[Your Full Name] \[Your Address] \[Phone Number] \[Email Address]
**To:** Planning & Zoning Department City Hall, 2nd Floor 302 W Reynolds Street Plant City, FL 33563 Email: [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]) **Subject:** Objection to Rezoning Application PB-2024-49 – Proposed 38-Unit Multi-Family Development on South Walker Street **Date:** \[Insert Today’s Date] Dear Planning & Zoning Department, I am writing as an adjacent property owner and concerned resident to formally object to Rezoning Application **PB-2024-49**, which proposes to rezone approximately 3.19 acres from R-1A Single-Family Dwelling District to Planned Development (PD) to allow for the construction of a **38-unit multi-family apartment complex** on **South Walker Street**, between **West Bates Street and West Grant Street**. ### **Objections:** 1. **Incompatible with Neighborhood Character** This is a well-established, quiet **single-family residential neighborhood** with narrow roadways and historic character. The proposed apartment complex is completely **incompatible** with the existing land use and would drastically alter the character and integrity of the community. 2. **Infrastructure Inadequacies** Our existing roadways cannot accommodate the expected **increase in traffic** from a 38-unit development. South Walker Street is already narrow—**two mid-size vehicles cannot pass without one pulling over**. This raises serious safety and emergency access concerns. There are **no current plans to widen these roads**, which would require **encroachment onto existing private property**, raising additional legal and ethical concerns. 3. **Drainage and Flooding Concerns** **Flooding is already a major issue** in this area during heavy rains. The removal of existing trees has only worsened this problem. Replacing greenspace with pavement and buildings will exacerbate stormwater runoff and **increase the flood risk** for surrounding homes. 4. **Environmental Impact** The area was previously **wooded**, providing natural drainage, shade, and a buffer between homes. All those trees have already been removed, and the proposed development will introduce more impervious surfaces, contributing to heat island effects and environmental degradation. 5. **Noise and Privacy Invasion** Placing a dense apartment complex—including a **dog park—directly between two single-family homes** is a direct intrusion on the **peace, quiet, and privacy** that existing homeowners are entitled to expect. This design does not respect the rights of the adjacent residents. 6. **Overdevelopment Concerns** Plant City has seen a rapid increase in development, often without proper assessment of long-term impacts. This proposal represents **overbuilding** in an area that was never intended to sustain multi-family density. Residents are deeply concerned about the **cumulative impact** of such decisions. --- ### **Request:** I respectfully urge the Planning Board and City Officials to **deny Application PB-2024-49**. If development must occur, it should be limited to **low-density, single-family homes** in keeping with the neighborhood’s zoning and infrastructure capacity. The proposed plan is excessive, invasive, and detrimental to the safety, character, and environment of the community. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please ensure this objection is entered into the public record ahead of the scheduled hearing on **July 23, 2025, at 8:30 AM**. Sincerely, \[Your Full Name] \[Your Address] \[Phone Number] \[Email Address]

About