@xgan.stria: Bangkit untuk jadi kuat🔥 #workout #workoutmotivation #calisthenics #motivasi #highvalueman

WIBU SUKA WORKOUT🤓
WIBU SUKA WORKOUT🤓
Open In TikTok:
Region: ID
Saturday 29 March 2025 10:24:11 GMT
285625
37605
251
1513

Music

Download

Comments

19_albert_
#@A£**π___/:)°°° :
jadilah kuat dan tunduk kepada yang terkuat
2025-03-29 10:54:18
301
arrkaannaa
Klik? uhuyy✌️ :
percuma aja ngga sih home wo tapi ngga konsumsi creatine 🗿
2025-03-29 11:51:05
41
nnneeoo
🎶 :
**"Aku terlahir lemah, Tapi tak ingin selamanya jatuh. Bukan kekuatan yang membuatku berdiri, Tapi kemauan untuk terus bangkit.
2025-07-23 16:12:26
0
orenmewing
OyenSigma :
bang,makan telor 5 butir sehari aman gak sih?
2025-03-29 10:27:55
6
kyutaroo0
Gaa Vol 10 :
bismillah konsisten habis lebaran 🔥
2025-03-29 11:28:45
12
otwtoji77
avilioBraun :
fisik makin kuat tapi hati sama aja🗿
2025-03-29 13:39:38
62
aldybocilpojav17
AldyMC⛏️ :
Thank you for the motivation🔥
2025-03-31 12:41:38
3
shibaguan2
. :
pertama bggg
2025-03-29 10:26:59
4
tidak.dikenal898
Y :
bg gw mau nanya, kenapa ya gw sehabis ngegym/angkat beban badan kok terasa njarem + sakit gitu knp ya bg🙏
2025-04-07 09:33:25
0
username_unknown1272
. :
jika kamu terlahir kuat lanjut kan king
2025-03-29 13:37:02
3
fahrul_2292
Fahrul_08 :
Cara linca pus up giaman bang?
2025-04-15 13:34:32
1
firman.aj302
Firman aj :
bg beli bawang mungkin dia bosan🗿
2025-03-29 10:29:28
0
tradegrowagarden_2
trade grow a garden :
thanks bang beri motivation gw mau mulai sekarang workout mulai bulan 31 Mac tahun 2025
2025-03-30 18:03:28
0
adibkecezzx
Zeynex💤 :
1x balasan 5x push
2025-03-31 01:14:54
16
nathanael.jefflin
Nathanael Jefflin :
dari mana datangnya luka?
2025-05-14 12:19:54
1
belajarbersamma
shoya ishida :
memaksimalkan genetik keluarga 😎
2025-03-29 10:29:16
1
yannnnabcyayhax
Radenputra🦸 :
hari pertama jadi lebih baik😄(gue simpen komen gue sampe day 30)
2025-06-24 16:27:47
1
fazaarmadhan
z :
jadikan lah hinaan sebagai motivasi🔥🔥
2025-05-11 15:07:45
3
fazz_aja50
PazZ |O_o :
fisik kuat tapi mental sama aja🗿
2025-04-27 13:52:27
1
choirul12344
IRUL 🇮🇩 :
aku terlahir lemah dan vonis dokter yg menjadikan aku menjadi lebih kuat
2025-04-16 02:12:26
1
amorz_ruok01
@Amorz444🥀 :
kita usaha kan Minggu depan 🥀
2025-04-28 14:38:01
1
masrti09
sicute😍 :
hujan"sambil wo enak benar
2025-04-17 06:57:25
1
inisials0301
INISIAL S🥀 :
puasa aman bg ?
2025-03-29 12:07:57
4
nezhamlbbgen1
Nezha NZ :
kita lahir dengan tubuh lemah tapi kita juga lahir dengan tujuan menjadi menjadi lebih kuat
2025-03-29 19:32:41
3
inal_rajaiblis
INAL_ARAP :
jika kamu terlahir dalam kemiskinan,maka bangkitlah menjadi kaya
2025-03-31 14:02:58
2
To see more videos from user @xgan.stria, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

the good ending 🫶🏾 #maga #trump #tariffs #america #usa  Cross fact-check from GPT: Image 1 – Chris Hayes quote tweet of $150B tariff revenue post ✅ Correct framing — Tariffs are paid by importers (often U.S. companies) and frequently passed on to American consumers through higher prices, meaning the burden effectively falls on Americans. ⸻ Image 2 – The Real DMT: “Tariffs are not a tax on Americans lol” ❌ Incorrect — While tariffs are levied on imports, economists broadly agree that the cost is largely borne by U.S. consumers through price increases, acting as a hidden tax. ⸻ Image 3 – Grok explaining tariffs ✅ Accurate — Tariffs are paid by importers but passed on to consumers, leading to price hikes; they can shield domestic industries but often raise consumer costs and hurt trade (per CFR, Tax Foundation). ⸻ Image 4 – The Real DMT follow-up asking about benefits 🟡 Partially accurate — Tariffs can incentivize domestic production, but evidence shows mixed success; economic studies find benefits are often offset by job losses, retaliation, and price hikes. ⸻ Image 5 – Grok reply with effects of tariffs ✅ Factually supported — Grok correctly states that while tariffs may raise revenue (~$150B), studies (Wharton, Tax Foundation) show GDP drops, job losses, and price inflation often outweigh the gains. ⸻ Image 6 – The Real DMT: “Really? Describe the harm…” 🟢 Reasonable inquiry — Asking for data is fair; the net harm vs. revenue is debated among economists and depends on the scope and duration of the tariffs. ⸻ Image 7 – Grok explains economic harm ✅ Well-supported — The cited impacts (0.9% GDP hit, 741K jobs lost, $1,270 per household burden) match research from the Tax Foundation and Yale models, which show deadweight losses exceed revenue. ⸻ Image 8 – The Real DMT: “Oof. Maybe tariffs…” 🟢 Reasonable conclusion — Acknowledging new evidence and reconsidering prior views is a fair and commendable response to complex economic data. ⸻ Image 9 – Cocatillian praising change of opinion ✅ Constructive sentiment — Encouraging open-mindedness and research aligns with sound critical thinking and public discourse values. ⸻ Image 10 – The Real DMT: “I love being wrong…” ✅ Positive and accurate — Learning from new information and updating beliefs is foundational to intellectual humility and evidence-based reasoning.
the good ending 🫶🏾 #maga #trump #tariffs #america #usa Cross fact-check from GPT: Image 1 – Chris Hayes quote tweet of $150B tariff revenue post ✅ Correct framing — Tariffs are paid by importers (often U.S. companies) and frequently passed on to American consumers through higher prices, meaning the burden effectively falls on Americans. ⸻ Image 2 – The Real DMT: “Tariffs are not a tax on Americans lol” ❌ Incorrect — While tariffs are levied on imports, economists broadly agree that the cost is largely borne by U.S. consumers through price increases, acting as a hidden tax. ⸻ Image 3 – Grok explaining tariffs ✅ Accurate — Tariffs are paid by importers but passed on to consumers, leading to price hikes; they can shield domestic industries but often raise consumer costs and hurt trade (per CFR, Tax Foundation). ⸻ Image 4 – The Real DMT follow-up asking about benefits 🟡 Partially accurate — Tariffs can incentivize domestic production, but evidence shows mixed success; economic studies find benefits are often offset by job losses, retaliation, and price hikes. ⸻ Image 5 – Grok reply with effects of tariffs ✅ Factually supported — Grok correctly states that while tariffs may raise revenue (~$150B), studies (Wharton, Tax Foundation) show GDP drops, job losses, and price inflation often outweigh the gains. ⸻ Image 6 – The Real DMT: “Really? Describe the harm…” 🟢 Reasonable inquiry — Asking for data is fair; the net harm vs. revenue is debated among economists and depends on the scope and duration of the tariffs. ⸻ Image 7 – Grok explains economic harm ✅ Well-supported — The cited impacts (0.9% GDP hit, 741K jobs lost, $1,270 per household burden) match research from the Tax Foundation and Yale models, which show deadweight losses exceed revenue. ⸻ Image 8 – The Real DMT: “Oof. Maybe tariffs…” 🟢 Reasonable conclusion — Acknowledging new evidence and reconsidering prior views is a fair and commendable response to complex economic data. ⸻ Image 9 – Cocatillian praising change of opinion ✅ Constructive sentiment — Encouraging open-mindedness and research aligns with sound critical thinking and public discourse values. ⸻ Image 10 – The Real DMT: “I love being wrong…” ✅ Positive and accurate — Learning from new information and updating beliefs is foundational to intellectual humility and evidence-based reasoning.

About