What if m isn't constant? That deserves some penalization.
2025-04-21 17:02:25
48
jfkalamzmam :
Wdym accuracy 10? It doesnt predict the orbit of Mercury
2025-04-21 18:16:51
2
Batata Frieren :
i never seen sigma in 2 newton law 😟
2025-04-23 19:15:04
0
moteymousam :
review Maxwell's equations
2025-04-21 17:35:17
36
Luca :
top 5 tiktok pages on the app rn and it's not even close
2025-04-21 17:14:00
7
yuvalva :
do Hamilton equations. simple, elegant, early generalized to QM, 1st order diff eq. doesn't get any better than this!
2025-04-21 22:01:13
4
Paulo Straddo :
I used to use it more often but the API now offers a few new higher-level objects that encapsulate the functionality (e.g. Lagrangean/Hamiltonian). The new objects are easier to use in some cases 🙂
2025-04-25 05:23:50
1
user8374683369500 :
the king of "let's see how good it is" over here
2025-04-23 01:18:46
1
Dakotah Tyler :
I’d give it a solid 9 but you nailed this
2025-04-23 07:58:46
1
wmute :
Congrats, Newton 🥳
2025-04-21 18:54:38
2
no name :
okay, now review Einstein’s Field Eqs
2025-04-23 17:16:14
1
Poatiastkyckilgn :
Dirac Equation
2025-04-21 17:08:38
1
raddoc93 :
need a PhD journey equation review
2025-04-23 17:15:30
0
Usurael :
my guy elegance and simplicity are synonyms, so you used 3 criteria.
2025-04-21 20:30:17
0
César Alvarez :
Review e^iπ + 1 = 0
2025-04-22 01:06:15
0
Chessman :
This equation is so beautiful when it's derived from action. (Src: veritasium)
2025-04-21 18:31:16
0
G :
Here is an equation for you 0 time = 0 distance. Think about that.
2025-04-22 07:07:10
0
Max :
Pls do more of these
2025-04-22 21:57:35
0
wazewhoa :
Directionality can be confusing, but a moments reflection on that leads to its beauty.
2025-04-21 18:49:50
0
Ali Ahsan :
V=IR
2025-04-21 17:37:54
3
cameron :
😁😁😁
2025-04-26 16:41:17
0
Sebastian Crone :
Hot take: Newton actually only has 2 laws of motion. The 1st can be explain by the 2nd, so there is no need for it.
2025-04-21 21:36:57
1
Bilu :
@Dr. Blitz or something
2025-04-21 17:07:19
1
Æther :
Max Plank left that nasty not on Einsteins paper that his definition of force wasn’t advantageous for their work, and then he got the wrong equation for E = mc^2 in his original paper.
2025-04-21 19:32:22
0
To see more videos from user @blackbirdphys, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.