@cnn: The Supreme Court heard arguments in a case about the enforcement of President Trump's birthright citizenship order. Five of the six conservative justices seemed open to backing the president but hesitant to stray from precedent. CNN's Paula Reid reports. #cnn #news #politics
Without a judge being able to block something, it becomes a dictatorship (even more of one that it is now).
2025-05-15 18:57:35
2453
cuteusername :
Presidents shouldn’t have this much power
2025-05-15 21:08:17
1184
Actfast00 :
200 executive orders isn’t even close to a record.
2025-05-16 23:04:03
0
user76936732736638 :
I thought I understood the hidden world. Then Secrets of The First Order showed me how much I was missing. No fluff. Raw truths only.
2025-05-16 01:31:31
756
Val ૮ ˶ᵔ ᵕ ᵔ˶ ა :
if he takes away birth right citizenship then the only people who can live here are native americans
2025-05-15 19:59:11
48
Tyson Draper :
This will be another win for TRUMP! 🇺🇸
2025-05-15 18:56:38
64
mrmistermoore :
200 executive orders in 5 months?
2025-05-15 19:09:58
1241
Rain Bo :
has he considered just not breaking the law?
2025-05-15 19:48:15
171
😁😁😁 :
Lord help America in Jesus name Amen
2025-05-20 03:19:02
0
user123456789 :
nationwide injunction should stand. its the only thing protecting us against trumps illegal actions over and over
2025-05-15 19:39:49
88
Tristan :
That’s called checks and balances, and therefore a reason
2025-05-15 19:05:57
383
Therecanonlybe1me :
wouldn't birthright citizenship apply to trump and his family bc last time I checked his family is German and his wife is not from here either but had Barron here under birthright citizenship
2025-05-15 19:27:26
91
Mando :
How is this even a question, executive orders can’t change the constitution
2025-05-15 19:12:34
546
Mignoncrvs :
thet is a constitutional right..this is so wrong
2025-05-15 19:30:15
141
TonyPortugalJk :
There’s actually no law whatsoever that allows judges to do a nationwide injunction
2025-05-15 19:12:42
4
Movouster :
None of them complained about the judges when they were blocking Biden's policies
2025-05-15 19:25:38
53
Entsy :
Man I’m really glad republicans decided to cancel checks and balances just in time for their president to do a bunch of EOs and not do it under Biden when the courts issued injunctions
2025-05-15 19:04:17
282
Repixeled :
That’s the whole point of CHECKS AND BALANCES
2025-05-15 20:25:12
121
a38yearoldman :
a nationwide injunction is considered unreasonable for something that affects the whole nation?
2025-05-17 23:57:12
0
cowboys4ever01 :
Right wingers better not complain when a Democrat does whatever he wants
2025-05-15 23:56:13
2
TokBrando 🇺🇸 :
You get to a single rule by congress passing a law. The judiciary should have no concern with breadth. Now that said, the Amendment is poorly written and favors birthright citizenship despite intent
2025-05-17 20:11:19
0
Keanu Reeves :
Without a judge being able to block something, it becomes a dictatorship (even more of one that it is now).
2025-05-17 22:46:01
0
Grammy :
It’s in the US Constitution…end of argument!!
2025-05-15 23:13:07
31
user6950259915316 :
If this passes, This is so damaging and goes against article 3. Federal courts should be able to make the injunctions, no matter what, and if necessary then it goes to SCOTUS
2025-05-17 00:32:52
0
nick name :
This is tbe whole purpose of federal circuits. its a FEDERAL judge
2025-05-15 23:45:07
2
To see more videos from user @cnn, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.