blackgabbydoll
Region: US
Sunday 01 June 2025 19:00:20 GMT
216118
12716
435
3858
Music
Download
Comments
diamondlove118 :
We will never get any respect
2025-08-01 06:57:49
0
Darkseid@ :
damn. 😍😱
2025-07-31 21:34:11
0
Jvo_Maz :
To bad it's not real 😔😔😔
2025-06-27 19:42:15
252
jayrich673 :
My check will be gone in child support
2025-06-15 04:56:19
38
tre :
Natural is the way for me 😅
2025-07-30 11:34:07
82
Pooh Mac821 :
It’s the hope on the curb😩🤣😂
2025-07-31 20:43:16
0
Shan :
You knew somebody was recording, that’s why you were switching hard
2025-07-30 21:53:31
61
M O L L Y :
Why she walking like that ? 😑😭
2025-07-30 20:20:09
182
Brandon Dunn :
I'll still eating 😏OMG
2025-07-31 18:17:16
0
Eddie Lequin Porter :
wait the banana pudding shake is back 🤤
2025-06-29 13:11:53
2
Gemi :
but like … damnmm🫠
2025-07-31 04:14:18
0
Muhammed🇸🇳 :
Expect to see more 100 favs on this video as long as you are keeping it here 🤣🤣🤣🤣
2025-07-31 05:24:48
0
Pause Recovery :
She knew what she was doing.😜👍🔥
2025-06-22 18:54:23
152
___Tev :
Naw I’m ok
2025-06-24 12:58:04
29
Dmoney :
those shakes are the best did you get me one as well
2025-06-26 21:52:13
2
Mr.MaKeItHappen :
I gotta taste for some pudding too now 🤣🤣🤣
2025-07-30 18:01:42
0
StacySdad Filmz :
The LORT is my shepherd 😩🤣
2025-06-21 01:41:48
3
ALane :
😭 I know she saw this
2025-07-31 00:42:32
0
_tempest_ :
Girl you know wyd coming outside like that 😂
2025-07-30 16:35:07
21
user7261380424179 :
Ummm
2025-07-30 22:46:14
0
Reaopinionsportswithjpw :
Real Opinion Sports with JPW
2025-06-26 21:00:30
1
Terro#72 :
Jell-O puddin, right there 😎
2025-06-24 01:17:26
5
To see more videos from user @blackgabbydoll, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
![𝗩𝗶𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗹𝘃𝗮𝗻 | ᴇᴅɪᴛ: 𝐓𝐚𝐧𝐠 𝐄𝐦𝐩𝐢𝐫𝐞🇨🇳 vs 𝐄𝐚𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐧 𝐓𝐮𝐫𝐤𝐬🇺🇳 Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers such as Skewes's number and Moser's number, both of which are in turn much larger than a googolplex. As with these, it is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain an ordinary digital representation of Graham's number, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume, possibly the smallest measurable space. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form a b c ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ {\displaystyle a^{b^{c^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\cdot }}}}}}, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of 3. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387. Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is g 64 {\displaystyle g_{64}},[1] where g n = { 3 ↑↑↑↑ 3 , if n = 1 and 3 ↑ g n − 1 3 , if n ≥ 2. {\displaystyle g_{n}={\begin{cases}3\uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow 3,&{\text{if }}n=1{\text{ and}}\\3\uparrow ^{g_{n-1}}3,&{\text{if }}n\geq 2.\end{cases}}} Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid. ᴍʏ ʙʀᴏ: @♰ArmenianᛉZi֍nist✡ @𝔹𝔸𝕊𝔼𝔻 ℂ𝔸ℝ @ϟϟ_NC_☭⃠ ꑭK8st_ya⬛️🟨⬜️☦️ @🇺🇦/🇷🇺 [🚩] qritez [☦] @☦︎spektor🪖 @👌🏻🇳🇿ᛟrevengeᛉ🇷🇺🙋🏼♂️ @всевышний дынька🇨🇨🇧🇾🇷🇺⚛️ @Император Роман Строгнов☦️☦️☦️ @Император Роман Строгнов☦️☦️☦️ @Казачок 𐰁 [🇷🇺/🇺🇦] @Cooking𝐓𝐌𝐃☸️☭⃠ @ruzzig71 @☧GagashikHD☦︎🇷🇺 @^_^ לרה @♰֍𝕵𝖊𝖗𝖒𝖚𝖐֍♰ @꧁♰֎𝕫𝓪𝓿𝓮𝓷֎♰꧂ 🇦🇲 @֎ 𝑨𝑹𝑻𝑰 🏳️ @꧁֎𝐋𝐘𝐔𝐓𝐈𝐘 𝐘𝐒𝐇𝐄֍꧂ @⚛️пⷬоⷷсⷥтⷶуⷮпꙺок гꙵеⷢрꙵоⷧя⚛️ @☭⃠ THE BASED MAN ⚛️ @[🇬🇷]VOD✵LAZ[☦️] @⚛🇺🇸▐┛AMERICANDUCE▐┛🇬🇧🇫🇷⚛ @ꍏꋪ꓄ꂑꉧ🇷🇺🇰🇿⚡⚡ @𖣐𝑺𝒍𝒂𝒗𝒊𝒂𝒏.𝑻𝒊𝒎𝒚☭ @𝙈𝙞𝙯𝙯𝙖𝙣𝙩𝙝𝙧𝙤𝙥𝙚 @𝐛𝐥𝐱𝐱𝐝𝐲𝐬𝐥𝐱𝐬𝐡𝐞𝐫🇷🇺 @𝘒𝘰𝘸𝘢𝘭𝘴𝘬𝘺 ⁵¹ @⁸³🇧🇦srebrenica slayer🇧🇦⁷² @ᛉ🍀141🌲ᛉ @🇷🇺аллах обыкновенный🇦🇲 ⁵¹ ʜᴀsʜᴛᴀɢs: #edit #China #turk #tangempire #Turks #Islam #real #based](/video/cover/7533656806955044126.webp)
