@muffin_47.9: (NO HATE BTW PEOPLE.) #wlw #dresses #model #men #women #fancy #oldmoney #suit #heels #valentinoheels #womeninsuits #fypシ #fypp #fyppppppppppppppppppppppp 🫦

muffin_47.9
muffin_47.9
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Thursday 05 June 2025 03:20:38 GMT
1797307
197915
4562
9736

Music

Download

Comments

To see more videos from user @muffin_47.9, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

The $499 Oakley Meta HSTN Limited Edition glasses add 3K video and eight hours of battery but are otherwise very similar to and more expensive than the Ray-Bans. Stylistically, the Oakleys are more polarizing. Not just because they have PRIZM lenses, either. Both my spouse and bestie scrunched their noses at the concept of white sunglasses. Multiple friends and coworkers pointed out the slanted area by the nose bridge, asking, “Why the hell does it do that?” (The answer is that Oakley’s regular HSTN glasses do that. It’s an Oakley thing.) Anyone can rock these, provided they bring a bit of swagger. Many people won’t feel comfortable with such a bold look. The main differences are a bump up in video resolution from 1080p to 3K, roughly double the battery to eight hours on a single charge, and Oakley’s PRIZM lenses on the limited edition. The extra battery is nice, since that’s one of the main complaints about Meta glasses for power users. Meanwhile, the PRIZM lenses enhance contrast and certain colors. It sounds like a marketing spiel, but I don’t think I’d truly experienced green until I saw the way trees and grass look through these glasses. The kicker is that all these things make the Oakleys more expensive. The standard Oakleys will start at $399, compared to $299 for the Ray-Bans. This limited edition version costs $499. That’s hard to swallow. I understand boosting 3K video resolution and battery life. Oakleys are more likely to appeal to outdoorsy folks. Those are the kinds of updates that crowd would want. But photo quality is identical. 3K videos are noticeably sharper, and you’d get decent action footage if you can figure out framing. (Once again, I was foiled by the corner of my baseball cap, my bangs, and a tendency to tilt my head.) Filming in 3K is a battery guzzler. Recording three 2.5-minute 3K videos of my cat and uploading them via Wi-Fi to my phone ate a whopping 20 percent of my battery. While they fit more easily into my life than I’d anticipated, they’re more a “nice to have” than a “must have.” As a runner, nothing will quite beat my Shokz OpenRun Pro 2 for open-ear audio, but I’ve enjoyed using these on my summer runs when the sun is punishingly bright. But the real question is how much do you like AI? How much do you trust Meta? Read the full review from Victoria Song at the link in our bio. Photos by Amelia Holowaty Krales Patience provided by Petey the cat
The $499 Oakley Meta HSTN Limited Edition glasses add 3K video and eight hours of battery but are otherwise very similar to and more expensive than the Ray-Bans. Stylistically, the Oakleys are more polarizing. Not just because they have PRIZM lenses, either. Both my spouse and bestie scrunched their noses at the concept of white sunglasses. Multiple friends and coworkers pointed out the slanted area by the nose bridge, asking, “Why the hell does it do that?” (The answer is that Oakley’s regular HSTN glasses do that. It’s an Oakley thing.) Anyone can rock these, provided they bring a bit of swagger. Many people won’t feel comfortable with such a bold look. The main differences are a bump up in video resolution from 1080p to 3K, roughly double the battery to eight hours on a single charge, and Oakley’s PRIZM lenses on the limited edition. The extra battery is nice, since that’s one of the main complaints about Meta glasses for power users. Meanwhile, the PRIZM lenses enhance contrast and certain colors. It sounds like a marketing spiel, but I don’t think I’d truly experienced green until I saw the way trees and grass look through these glasses. The kicker is that all these things make the Oakleys more expensive. The standard Oakleys will start at $399, compared to $299 for the Ray-Bans. This limited edition version costs $499. That’s hard to swallow. I understand boosting 3K video resolution and battery life. Oakleys are more likely to appeal to outdoorsy folks. Those are the kinds of updates that crowd would want. But photo quality is identical. 3K videos are noticeably sharper, and you’d get decent action footage if you can figure out framing. (Once again, I was foiled by the corner of my baseball cap, my bangs, and a tendency to tilt my head.) Filming in 3K is a battery guzzler. Recording three 2.5-minute 3K videos of my cat and uploading them via Wi-Fi to my phone ate a whopping 20 percent of my battery. While they fit more easily into my life than I’d anticipated, they’re more a “nice to have” than a “must have.” As a runner, nothing will quite beat my Shokz OpenRun Pro 2 for open-ear audio, but I’ve enjoyed using these on my summer runs when the sun is punishingly bright. But the real question is how much do you like AI? How much do you trust Meta? Read the full review from Victoria Song at the link in our bio. Photos by Amelia Holowaty Krales Patience provided by Petey the cat

About