Kevin Carnahan
Region: US
Thursday 05 June 2025 15:46:08 GMT
20483
1332
67
14
Music
Download
Comments
DickSwett :
Just realizing I’ve never seen Jewish apologetics before lol
2025-06-05 16:03:27
118
mrpiggyv :
Even if you look at the Gospel alone and take out the Acts and Epistles most Rabbi’s don’t disagree with Jesus’ sermons, they reject the Christian claims of him being messianic and being God. Jesus was just ahead of the Pharisees eventually transition to Rabbinic Judaism
2025-06-05 23:00:11
9
The Religious Treehouse :
Moses is disappointed! 😂
2025-06-05 17:08:22
8
ArmorFrog Entertainment YT🟥 :
Like, the practice of not eating meat and dairy at the same meal is not literally in the Torah. it's a later interpretation of a passage.
2025-06-06 03:56:55
7
jaybee_56 :
Is this your spinoff series on apologists of other religions? Can you do Zoroasterianism next? 😜 Love your videos btw
2025-06-06 02:37:13
6
1313niels :
I agree with this idea. Christianity is as much a continuation of the old testiment as is the talmud. Any jew who also interprets the Thora more in contemporary context acts a bit like Jesus his way. I think it is also nice to have this brotherhood
2025-06-05 16:13:36
3
🎗 Aviel ✡︎ :
so ur 2 arguments are: 1. Also the rabbis in the talmud interept and add to the text so christians doing it isnt a problem. 2. the tanakh teaches that the only way to repentence is blood scarifice and tshuva is a rabbinic invention. 1. The difference is that the NT goes against the torah. the Tanakh says no and the NT says yes. thats not an interpetion. also, the talmud doesnt add to the tanakh. we dont believe the talmud is the word of God. just the tanakh. we see the talmud as a book of rabbis debating on the tanakh. but the christians, believe the NT is the word of God. and not just that. they cancel rules that are found in the tanakh Torah: Prohibits eating pork, shellfish, and other non-kosher animals (Leviticus 11) NT: Declares all foods clean. and ofc, there are many more. 2. in the tanakh, we can find a lot of times when blood sacrifice isnt nessesery. God forgive king david and nineveh without a sacrifice. “Then God saw their works, that they turned from their evil way; and God relented from the disaster that He had said He would bring upon them.” (Jonah 3:10) no sacrifice mention. And David said unto Nathan: ‘I have sinned against the LORD.’ And Nathan said unto David: ‘The LORD also hath put away thy sin; thou shalt not die.’” (Samuel 12:13) no sacrifice mention.
2025-06-08 09:21:10
2
notallchads :
fool of a pentatook 🧙♀️
2025-06-08 02:20:39
2
Xander :
I don't have a lot of exposure to modern Judaism, is the Talmud considered to be scripture on the same level as the Torah, like how the Old and New Testaments are equally scripture in Christianity? Or is the Talmud more on the level of the church fathers/patristic writings in Catholicism and Orthodoxy?
2025-06-05 16:05:39
2
🇬🇧🫷kris🫸🇬🇧 :
it's almost like perceiving catholicism as being bad because there's stuff in there not in the standard Bible, a faith as old as Judaism or Christianity has always had stuff being added, it's up to the reader/believer to decipher if it makes sense or is in bad faith in contrast to the rest (I my opinion I'm probably very wrong)
2025-06-05 15:56:57
2
Coby 🇮🇱 :
Unless you’re arguing the prophets such as Ezekiel and Daniel who lived in exile and taught us how to repent with no sacrificial system to be rabbis and therefore their word would be rabbinic development, which in that case, fair enough I’d concede, but assuming that wasn’t your point. I’m not sure how you can argue that repentance without blood is a rabbinic development with so many verses in the prophets and writings (and Torah) discussing repentance without sacrifice. King David being forgiven, Daniel being righteous, ninveh, Ezekiel’s many verses telling people to turn back to G-D etc etc. Isaiah 1 says G-D is sick of sacrifices. I don’t see how you can fairly call it “reinterpreting the text” when we have texts that describe specifically repentance without sacrifice/sacrificial system . Wouldn’t that just be interpreting the text? How are you arguing rabbinical Judaism to not be a continuation of the Torah? The Torah gives rabbis the authority to create rabbinic Judaism in duet 17. Would that not make rabbinic Judaism a direct continuation of Torah? @Kevin Carnahan
2025-06-06 13:16:17
1
Slickrick :
When I grow up, I want a sequel.
2025-06-06 12:34:36
1
𝑳𝒊𝒐𝒓💕 :
@Shonil
2025-06-06 08:17:15
1
Darkpuka :
The Samaritans are fascinating
2025-06-05 16:15:34
1
Hyde Jekyll :
Why would Moses be disappointed when he wrote "According to the law which they shall teach you, and according to the judgment which they shall tell you, you shall do; you shall not turn aside from the word which they declare to you, to the right or to the left." — Deuteronomy 17:11.
2025-07-23 16:07:45
0
Moriizocur :
@Rabbi Mordy is there some type of false equivalency at play?
2025-07-13 19:23:59
1
Luiz Schwartz :
😁😅
2025-06-21 21:53:38
0
🎗📟 boaz VD :
but the talmud and even the נ"ך are not at the same level as the torah. you guys claim that the NT is not only the same level of the torah but also cancell its authority
2025-06-10 14:18:32
0
Rmoralesw :
the whole point of the torah is the system of sacrifices and the atonement because of them. About the high priest that intercedes in the holy of holies, etc.
2025-06-08 20:47:57
0
frmser :
😁
2025-06-07 05:37:34
0
Eric :
🥰🥰🥰
2025-06-06 20:56:24
0
yeah :
townwood
2025-06-06 04:21:43
0
meowmeowmeowmoewmeeow :
😂😂😂
2025-06-06 01:16:54
0
Bookends :
@The “Bookshelf!” Guy @The "Whiteboard!" Guy
2025-06-05 22:26:51
0
To see more videos from user @kevincarnahan2, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
