@giancrstesq: Why did the defense not argue Third Party Culprit in their suggested Jury Instructions in the Karen Read Case? #greenscreen #truecrimetok #KarenRead #LawyerBreakdown #TrialTwist #TrueCrimeTikTok #truecrime #LegalAnalysis #TrueCrimeCommunity #DefensePerspective #DefensePerspective #LiveAt6 #CourtroomUpdate #KarenReadTrial
I know why they charged her. But it most cases when the evidence is so mishandled most DAs wouldn’t even try prosecution
2025-06-09 12:10:22
0
Cannon :
It wasn’t necessary. Enough corruption, zero investigations and more reasonable doubt than evidence.
2025-06-06 13:14:14
28
Missy :
Why does Bev sustain everything the prosecution objects too?
2025-06-06 15:33:51
17
Kit :
I think 3rd party is more than implied here and I don't think the jury needs an instruction that gives them what is essentially permission, to consider it.
2025-06-06 13:37:14
12
user3287429406326 :
Defense doesn’t want them to have to pin it on someone— just wants to make sure that they don’t pin it on KR. There is more inference by the negligent handling & manipulation of evidence
2025-06-06 17:23:17
7
Stacy 🐺 :
IMO: it narrows the focus. Jury only has to rule out Karen. Don’t bother with who else did it then? Just decide; Karen is not the one who did this.
2025-06-06 20:29:50
4
Dillinger :
Will defense call Proctor to stand ? And if not , why ? Thanks
2025-06-06 14:54:33
3
Joel :
I feel like adding a 3rd party culprit instruction adds a burden on the defence to fully prove to the jury.
2025-06-06 14:13:29
2
toddanth0ny :
Smart decision cause we know they are thinking it with what has been presented to them already!
2025-06-06 14:04:47
2
Stacy 🐺 :
I also think, defense is saying, “we are not pointing fingers at anyone else. We are only here to consider Karen.” So does this take Higgins and Proctor out of the blame game?
2025-06-06 20:31:26
1
Kelly B :
That all may be true if u didnt have a defense attorney explain in his opening arguments that he was going to put forth evidence of Brian Albert and Brian Higgins being the culprits. And that he could prove, with a witness mind you, that John went into the house. Hard to now claim Bowden when even the defense couldn't find evidence that he even went into the house.
2025-06-08 15:55:58
0
KellyC0908 :
Praying for this jury! 🙏🏽🙏🏽😩
2025-06-08 05:29:01
0
ashrenz724 :
🥰🥰🥰
2025-06-07 20:51:36
0
Jackie Michelle :
do they have to like write up a report and explain why they decide what they do? they jury
2025-06-07 17:54:49
0
RetiredBartender :
There is enough there to infer it wasn’t Karen
2025-06-07 15:29:23
0
CluckHubby :
Higgins not testifying is big mistakes need to get those butt dials and destroying phones on record
2025-06-07 15:13:17
0
Magoo1978 :
Thank you for this explaination! I’ve been confused about this and this clears it up for me
2025-06-07 08:05:21
0
RobJan :
It lifts the burden of the jury to “solve the case”
2025-06-07 04:34:34
0
Reach Up & Shine :
It is mind boggling that nobody of higher power step olin to stop this bullshit
2025-06-07 03:10:04
0
Paige Caudill :
🥰🥰🥰
2025-06-07 02:24:19
0
Paige Caudill :
😂😂😂
2025-06-07 02:24:15
0
user4189439382057 :
😂😂😂
2025-06-07 02:21:12
0
valeriejames6559 :
I think "Randy" did it
2025-06-06 23:39:18
0
PinkGoldPeach :
Also because there was more than one culprit. That creates confusion about what 3rd party means
2025-06-06 23:11:56
0
Doc1881 :
Bev will not allow it, she is going to do everything she a direct this verdict.
2025-06-06 22:39:12
0
karen.donna04 :
Bevs not going to allow anything that doesn’t suit defence
2025-06-06 21:01:58
0
Mindy :
I agree with this strategy- I just pray someone really hammers on defining reasonable doubt to them.
2025-06-06 20:33:37
0
Val Gregori :
Hank is really just irritating me today!! 😆 Just because your experts are quacks, doesn't mean everyone is! Go home Hanky!
2025-06-06 18:28:59
0
Suzanne Ford922 :
I’ve been a nurse my whole life. This is so interesting. Thanks so much for the explanation.
2025-06-06 17:54:03
0
Artemis :
Wonderful explanation Steph! Thank you for this info. You make following this case so easy. I do not think they needed to suggest the 3rd party.
2025-06-06 17:18:17
0
brennsta | gf bread & beyond :
This is sooo interesting
2025-06-06 16:05:28
0
itssunnyhere :
😂😂😂
2025-06-06 14:48:46
0
Wilson :
🔥🔥🔥
2025-06-06 14:44:50
0
Brian Boudreau :
Perhaps the defense wishes to set up the hypothesis of 3rd party slowly and when enough witnesses lead their testimony towards a third party and enough doubt of Karen then add 3rd party consideration
2025-06-06 13:39:29
1
genaO-gen❌ :
Yeah I don’t think instructions are needed for this. I believe it comes with the reasonable doubt. Especially in this crap show.
2025-06-06 13:33:14
2
To see more videos from user @giancrstesq, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.