@giancrstesq: Why did the defense not argue Third Party Culprit in their suggested Jury Instructions in the Karen Read Case? #greenscreen #truecrimetok #KarenRead #LawyerBreakdown #TrialTwist #TrueCrimeTikTok #truecrime #LegalAnalysis #TrueCrimeCommunity #DefensePerspective #DefensePerspective #LiveAt6 #CourtroomUpdate #KarenReadTrial

Stephanie, Esq.
Stephanie, Esq.
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Friday 06 June 2025 13:06:29 GMT
9818
517
42
10

Music

Download

Comments

its_me_and_mydogs
its_me_and_mydogs :
I know why they charged her. But it most cases when the evidence is so mishandled most DAs wouldn’t even try prosecution
2025-06-09 12:10:22
0
zac_cannon1
Cannon :
It wasn’t necessary. Enough corruption, zero investigations and more reasonable doubt than evidence.
2025-06-06 13:14:14
28
emptynesterboymom
Missy :
Why does Bev sustain everything the prosecution objects too?
2025-06-06 15:33:51
17
kitiaralil
Kit :
I think 3rd party is more than implied here and I don't think the jury needs an instruction that gives them what is essentially permission, to consider it.
2025-06-06 13:37:14
12
user3287429406326
user3287429406326 :
Defense doesn’t want them to have to pin it on someone— just wants to make sure that they don’t pin it on KR. There is more inference by the negligent handling & manipulation of evidence
2025-06-06 17:23:17
7
missmightdo
Stacy 🐺 :
IMO: it narrows the focus. Jury only has to rule out Karen. Don’t bother with who else did it then? Just decide; Karen is not the one who did this.
2025-06-06 20:29:50
4
boozer1029
Dillinger :
Will defense call Proctor to stand ? And if not , why ? Thanks
2025-06-06 14:54:33
3
talltourist
Joel :
I feel like adding a 3rd party culprit instruction adds a burden on the defence to fully prove to the jury.
2025-06-06 14:13:29
2
toddanth0ny
toddanth0ny :
Smart decision cause we know they are thinking it with what has been presented to them already!
2025-06-06 14:04:47
2
missmightdo
Stacy 🐺 :
I also think, defense is saying, “we are not pointing fingers at anyone else. We are only here to consider Karen.” So does this take Higgins and Proctor out of the blame game?
2025-06-06 20:31:26
1
kelly.burton70
Kelly B :
That all may be true if u didnt have a defense attorney explain in his opening arguments that he was going to put forth evidence of Brian Albert and Brian Higgins being the culprits. And that he could prove, with a witness mind you, that John went into the house. Hard to now claim Bowden when even the defense couldn't find evidence that he even went into the house.
2025-06-08 15:55:58
0
kellyc0908
KellyC0908 :
Praying for this jury! 🙏🏽🙏🏽😩
2025-06-08 05:29:01
0
ashrenz724
ashrenz724 :
🥰🥰🥰
2025-06-07 20:51:36
0
holdensrhm
Jackie Michelle :
do they have to like write up a report and explain why they decide what they do? they jury
2025-06-07 17:54:49
0
theretiredbartender
RetiredBartender :
There is enough there to infer it wasn’t Karen
2025-06-07 15:29:23
0
cluckhubby
CluckHubby :
Higgins not testifying is big mistakes need to get those butt dials and destroying phones on record
2025-06-07 15:13:17
0
magoo1960
Magoo1978 :
Thank you for this explaination! I’ve been confused about this and this clears it up for me
2025-06-07 08:05:21
0
rjan1021
RobJan :
It lifts the burden of the jury to “solve the case”
2025-06-07 04:34:34
0
reach.up.and.shine777
Reach Up & Shine :
It is mind boggling that nobody of higher power step olin to stop this bullshit
2025-06-07 03:10:04
0
paigecaudill9
Paige Caudill :
🥰🥰🥰
2025-06-07 02:24:19
0
paigecaudill9
Paige Caudill :
😂😂😂
2025-06-07 02:24:15
0
farmasikelly
user4189439382057 :
😂😂😂
2025-06-07 02:21:12
0
valeriejames6559
valeriejames6559 :
I think "Randy" did it
2025-06-06 23:39:18
0
pinkgoldpeacchhh
PinkGoldPeach :
Also because there was more than one culprit. That creates confusion about what 3rd party means
2025-06-06 23:11:56
0
millerlite1881
Doc1881 :
Bev will not allow it, she is going to do everything she a direct this verdict.
2025-06-06 22:39:12
0
karen.donna04
karen.donna04 :
Bevs not going to allow anything that doesn’t suit defence
2025-06-06 21:01:58
0
mimi4kids4
Mindy :
I agree with this strategy- I just pray someone really hammers on defining reasonable doubt to them.
2025-06-06 20:33:37
0
val_g78
Val Gregori :
Hank is really just irritating me today!! 😆 Just because your experts are quacks, doesn't mean everyone is! Go home Hanky!
2025-06-06 18:28:59
0
usersuzlexus.7
Suzanne Ford922 :
I’ve been a nurse my whole life. This is so interesting. Thanks so much for the explanation.
2025-06-06 17:54:03
0
lokiface
Artemis :
Wonderful explanation Steph! Thank you for this info. You make following this case so easy. I do not think they needed to suggest the 3rd party.
2025-06-06 17:18:17
0
brennsta
brennsta | gf bread & beyond :
This is sooo interesting
2025-06-06 16:05:28
0
_itssunnyhere_
itssunnyhere :
😂😂😂
2025-06-06 14:48:46
0
masterwilson2018
Wilson :
🔥🔥🔥
2025-06-06 14:44:50
0
jdaniels6363
Brian Boudreau :
Perhaps the defense wishes to set up the hypothesis of 3rd party slowly and when enough witnesses lead their testimony towards a third party and enough doubt of Karen then add 3rd party consideration
2025-06-06 13:39:29
1
genaogenx
genaO-gen❌ :
Yeah I don’t think instructions are needed for this. I believe it comes with the reasonable doubt. Especially in this crap show.
2025-06-06 13:33:14
2
To see more videos from user @giancrstesq, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos


About