@babar.946: #attitude

👑Motivation👑
👑Motivation👑
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Saturday 21 June 2025 04:59:16 GMT
1933877
51907
2881
7717

Music

Download

Comments

user423886179
user Rabi :
yes
2025-07-27 10:48:30
0
mohanlalhiemradj
Mohanlal Hiemradj :
yes
2025-07-29 14:26:58
0
amirking564
Amir King :
yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes
2025-07-29 21:34:10
0
sameeraskani30
sameeraskani30 :
Good🥰
2025-07-29 19:48:50
0
koni11222
𝙥𝙖𝙝𝙩𝙤𝙤𝙣 𝙡𝙤𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙨😍 :
pir fida kia🤣
2025-07-19 09:27:26
1
kirby_332
kirby_332 :
YES YES YOU'RE VERY MUCH TRUE BHAI
2025-06-29 06:52:16
5
syahirahketuww
❣️like🌍 :
yes brother 👍
2025-07-18 01:15:36
3
arooba_sheikhh
arooba_sheikhh :
Yeh mera bhai ha 🤣
2025-07-26 10:28:16
0
lakii.khera
laki Ber :
no, enjoy your life, you can not take the money with you.
2025-07-24 08:15:07
0
binodram6968
बिनोद राम :
येस
2025-06-29 20:55:45
1
muhammad.haris137
. :
yes boss
2025-06-29 16:36:01
24
user301761610
asim khan :
yas
2025-07-04 19:37:11
18
abdul_jabbar_32
ARSHAD_MAZARI_67 :
yes
2025-07-29 07:45:13
0
amirking564
Amir King :
ok❤️❤️❤️❤️
2025-07-29 21:33:26
0
rahulmoennoe
moennoe Mohammed rahul :
yesss
2025-07-13 02:51:13
2
jutti_170
ashiashi897 :
Yes right
2025-07-22 10:12:42
0
mdmamunmiah213
@mamunmiah iam Sylheti 🇴🇲✈️ :
yess boss right information 💯💯
2025-07-23 16:42:55
0
sherzmankhokhar9
دعوت تبلیغ زندہ آباد :
yes ok thanks 👍 lucky brand 39
2025-07-28 06:51:07
0
wahab_vibes
Malik Abdul Wahab Khan :
Pir fida kia
2025-07-24 12:12:48
0
akhan.007
꧁乂✰ꭺ𝘀ɑ𝐝Khɑ𝗻✰乂꧂ :
bilkul right kaha is bahi ny super
2025-07-22 11:06:33
0
adilfarooq168
saqib sultani :
yas
2025-07-28 15:44:18
0
adeelahmed201803
adeel_ahmed👈♥️ :
yes
2025-07-29 11:57:46
0
user133411619
Narinder :
100 right
2025-07-19 16:54:41
0
shakilhossainapu23
""Apu Hossain 🇮🇹❤️ :
yes best idea
2025-07-23 17:35:58
0
khadir148
Qûdîr Büx 001 :
yas wari
2025-07-15 12:02:44
1
To see more videos from user @babar.946, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

South Asia’s modern identity, its borders, economies, social tensions, and even its languages are deeply shaped by centuries of colonial domination, most prominently under the British Raj but also through earlier European footholds established by the Portuguese, Dutch, and French. To imagine a South Asia without colonialism is not merely to erase a chapter of its history; it is to envision an alternate trajectory where the region’s political evolution, economic foundations, and cultural continuity develop entirely through indigenous forces and regional interactions rather than foreign imposition. Such a vision reveals just how radically different South Asia’s present might have been — a world where the scars of partition might never form, where its industries may rival those of Europe, and where cultural syncretism evolves organically rather than under the pressure of imperial structures. Prior to colonial domination, South Asia was not a monolith but a tapestry of empires, kingdoms, and communities that spanned from the Mughal Empire’s vast dominion to the Maratha Confederacy, the Sikh Empire, and numerous southern powers like Mysore and Travancore. By the 18th century, while the Mughal Empire was in decline, it remained a formidable cultural and administrative entity, presiding over one of the wealthiest regions on earth. India alone contributed around a quarter of global GDP in 1700, with Bengal being famously prosperous for its textiles and agriculture. Without European colonization, the natural decline of Mughal power would likely have led to the rise of successor states, much as had happened in earlier historical cycles. The Marathas might consolidate their power further, the Sikhs in Punjab could emerge as a dominant northern force, and regional southern kingdoms could modernize on their own terms. Instead of an artificially unified subcontinent forged by British conquest, South Asia might have remained a multi-polar region, perhaps akin to Europe with numerous competitive yet interlinked polities. Economically, the absence of colonialism would mark one of the most drastic differences. British colonial policy deliberately deindustrialized South Asia, dismantling its thriving textile and handicraft industries to make way for British manufactured goods. Entire regions such as Bengal, once famed for muslin and silk, were impoverished as artisanal skills withered under exploitative policies and forced cash-cropping for indigo, cotton, and opium. Without this systemic extraction, South Asia’s indigenous industries could have evolved naturally, embracing mechanization on their own timeline, potentially spurred by interactions with global trade rather than subjugation to it. Merchant classes such as the Marwaris and Chettiars already possessed sophisticated financial networks; without colonial disruption, they might have spearheaded homegrown capitalism and industrialization comparable to Japan’s Meiji-era transformation. Railways, often touted as Britain’s “gift” to India, may still have emerged through internal demand for trade and military mobility, but without the exploitative freight policies designed to drain resources outward to imperial markets. The agrarian economy, too, would look unrecognizable. British land revenue systems, particularly the Permanent Settlement, entrenched landlordism and extracted high taxes that pushed millions into debt and famine. In a non-colonial South Asia, agrarian relations would remain shaped by local power structures — often exploitative in their own ways — but the absence of cash crop imperatives and export-oriented monocultures might have allowed greater food security. #fyp #trends #foryoupage❤️❤️ #maps #map #alternate #india #pakistan #bangladesh #desi #desifood #hinduism #christianity #islamic_video
South Asia’s modern identity, its borders, economies, social tensions, and even its languages are deeply shaped by centuries of colonial domination, most prominently under the British Raj but also through earlier European footholds established by the Portuguese, Dutch, and French. To imagine a South Asia without colonialism is not merely to erase a chapter of its history; it is to envision an alternate trajectory where the region’s political evolution, economic foundations, and cultural continuity develop entirely through indigenous forces and regional interactions rather than foreign imposition. Such a vision reveals just how radically different South Asia’s present might have been — a world where the scars of partition might never form, where its industries may rival those of Europe, and where cultural syncretism evolves organically rather than under the pressure of imperial structures. Prior to colonial domination, South Asia was not a monolith but a tapestry of empires, kingdoms, and communities that spanned from the Mughal Empire’s vast dominion to the Maratha Confederacy, the Sikh Empire, and numerous southern powers like Mysore and Travancore. By the 18th century, while the Mughal Empire was in decline, it remained a formidable cultural and administrative entity, presiding over one of the wealthiest regions on earth. India alone contributed around a quarter of global GDP in 1700, with Bengal being famously prosperous for its textiles and agriculture. Without European colonization, the natural decline of Mughal power would likely have led to the rise of successor states, much as had happened in earlier historical cycles. The Marathas might consolidate their power further, the Sikhs in Punjab could emerge as a dominant northern force, and regional southern kingdoms could modernize on their own terms. Instead of an artificially unified subcontinent forged by British conquest, South Asia might have remained a multi-polar region, perhaps akin to Europe with numerous competitive yet interlinked polities. Economically, the absence of colonialism would mark one of the most drastic differences. British colonial policy deliberately deindustrialized South Asia, dismantling its thriving textile and handicraft industries to make way for British manufactured goods. Entire regions such as Bengal, once famed for muslin and silk, were impoverished as artisanal skills withered under exploitative policies and forced cash-cropping for indigo, cotton, and opium. Without this systemic extraction, South Asia’s indigenous industries could have evolved naturally, embracing mechanization on their own timeline, potentially spurred by interactions with global trade rather than subjugation to it. Merchant classes such as the Marwaris and Chettiars already possessed sophisticated financial networks; without colonial disruption, they might have spearheaded homegrown capitalism and industrialization comparable to Japan’s Meiji-era transformation. Railways, often touted as Britain’s “gift” to India, may still have emerged through internal demand for trade and military mobility, but without the exploitative freight policies designed to drain resources outward to imperial markets. The agrarian economy, too, would look unrecognizable. British land revenue systems, particularly the Permanent Settlement, entrenched landlordism and extracted high taxes that pushed millions into debt and famine. In a non-colonial South Asia, agrarian relations would remain shaped by local power structures — often exploitative in their own ways — but the absence of cash crop imperatives and export-oriented monocultures might have allowed greater food security. #fyp #trends #foryoupage❤️❤️ #maps #map #alternate #india #pakistan #bangladesh #desi #desifood #hinduism #christianity #islamic_video

About