@laura_vastarella_:

𝐋𝐚𝐮𝐫𝐚 🌺
𝐋𝐚𝐮𝐫𝐚 🌺
Open In TikTok:
Region: IT
Sunday 22 June 2025 20:11:32 GMT
4852
795
40
10

Music

Download

Comments

user2127434477395
user2127434477395 :
bellissima
2025-06-28 23:53:17
0
eneacesaretirelli
Enea :
Sempre Incantevole e Solare 😍😍😍
2025-06-23 05:13:53
0
gabrieledalessio194
gabriel :
buon inizio settimana dottoressa 🥰
2025-06-23 17:07:37
0
gian18306
gian :
Fisico super top
2025-06-23 04:45:24
0
giuseppecentrell7
giuseppecentrell7 :
sei bellissima una perla meravigliosa 💘💘💘💘💘💘💘💘💘💘💘💘💘💘💘💘💘💘💘💘 sei un amore di ragazza 💝💝💝💝💝💝💝💝💝💝💝💝💝💝💝💝💝💝💝💝💝💝💝💝💝💝💝💝
2025-06-23 20:04:26
0
eduardoefrancesco
eduardoefrancesco :
meravigliosa ❤❤❤❤
2025-06-23 09:18:20
0
mauricio.alarcon21
Mauricio Alarcon Muñoz :
😳😳😳😳😳wuuuuu
2025-06-23 10:31:22
0
user431616aze
aze :
sei stupenda 🥰
2025-06-23 08:47:00
0
fino7508
fino :
🥰😚
2025-06-25 02:23:16
0
user02415133
Omar Bilbo :
🥰🥰🥰
2025-06-25 01:47:21
0
user4980527529255
محمد هاني :
🌹
2025-06-24 19:09:11
0
nattmendes2
Nathália Mendesz :
🥰
2025-06-24 01:57:41
0
bahja0075
bahja0075 :
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
2025-06-23 22:14:34
0
tipovioo1
user1095189409629 :
🥰
2025-06-23 18:21:19
0
jgarcia377
jgarcia377 :
🥰🥰🥰
2025-06-23 18:07:22
0
jgarcia377
jgarcia377 :
❤❤❤
2025-06-23 18:07:27
0
kwstaska
Κώστας καγκ :
🥰🥰🥰
2025-06-23 10:53:10
0
gianvito.fanelli
Gianvito Fanelli :
🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰
2025-06-23 06:33:54
0
aminekadir3
bahri bahri :
🥰🥰🥰
2025-06-23 04:01:41
0
raffaeledapice
Raffaele D'apice 🕊️🕊️ :
😍
2025-06-23 02:53:41
0
user02415133
Omar Bilbo :
🥰🥰🥰
2025-06-23 02:43:56
0
respected161
Respected :
🔥🔥🔥
2025-06-23 00:45:37
0
ismafey0
Isma :
🤗🤗🤗
2025-06-22 22:33:48
0
luigisansaro
Sansaro Luigi :
🥰🥰🥰
2025-06-22 21:32:55
0
robertomenatorres
ROBERTO :
🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰
2025-06-22 21:22:55
0
To see more videos from user @laura_vastarella_, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

bro genuinely crashing out on an AI #trump #maga #grok #rfkjr #republicans  Cross fact-check from ChatGPT: ❌ RepublicansAgainstTrump: Wind isn’t “the most expensive”—Lazard 2025 shows onshore wind ~$37/MWh (one of the cheapest new-build sources) and offshore ~$70/MWh, both below coal/nuclear; NOAA says there’s no evidence offshore wind caused whale deaths, with many strandings tied to vessel strikes/entanglement.    ✅ grok: Largely right—wind (esp. onshore) has among the lowest LCOE, and NOAA reports no link between offshore wind and recent whale deaths; recent East Coast strandings occurred, but necropsies often show ship strikes/gear.    ⚠️ Hannibal999: It’s true turbine noise overlaps baleen-whale frequencies, but studies find operational turbine noise is relatively low and shipping dominates low-frequency ocean noise; the strongest wind-related noise risks are from construction (pile-driving) and are mitigated.     ✅ grok: Directionally accurate—operational turbine noise is typically around 105–125 dB @ 100 m, while shipping is a dominant low-frequency source; current NOAA/BOEM literature finds no evidence that turbine operations cause whale strandings.     ⚠️ Hannibal999: Masking depends on frequency, distance, and duration (point taken), yet measured turbine operational levels suggest any masking is localized and much smaller than shipping’s contribution; population-level effects remain unconfirmed.     ✅ grok: Supported—literature and NOAA reviews indicate overlap ≠ significant disruption at operational levels; construction noise is addressed with mitigation, and there are no links to deaths from wind operations.     ⚠️ Hannibal999: Correct that dB are logarithmic and chronic noise matters, but evidence that wind farms raise regional noise floors enough to shrink baleen communication ranges is limited/uncertain; agencies note knowledge gaps and keep studying cumulative effects.   ✅ grok: Accurate—NOAA’s IHA/Federal Register notices and FAQs state no evidence linking recent whale mortalities to offshore wind; impacts are expected to be minimal and mitigated, while cumulative effects are still being studied (GAO 2025).
bro genuinely crashing out on an AI #trump #maga #grok #rfkjr #republicans Cross fact-check from ChatGPT: ❌ RepublicansAgainstTrump: Wind isn’t “the most expensive”—Lazard 2025 shows onshore wind ~$37/MWh (one of the cheapest new-build sources) and offshore ~$70/MWh, both below coal/nuclear; NOAA says there’s no evidence offshore wind caused whale deaths, with many strandings tied to vessel strikes/entanglement. ✅ grok: Largely right—wind (esp. onshore) has among the lowest LCOE, and NOAA reports no link between offshore wind and recent whale deaths; recent East Coast strandings occurred, but necropsies often show ship strikes/gear. ⚠️ Hannibal999: It’s true turbine noise overlaps baleen-whale frequencies, but studies find operational turbine noise is relatively low and shipping dominates low-frequency ocean noise; the strongest wind-related noise risks are from construction (pile-driving) and are mitigated. ✅ grok: Directionally accurate—operational turbine noise is typically around 105–125 dB @ 100 m, while shipping is a dominant low-frequency source; current NOAA/BOEM literature finds no evidence that turbine operations cause whale strandings. ⚠️ Hannibal999: Masking depends on frequency, distance, and duration (point taken), yet measured turbine operational levels suggest any masking is localized and much smaller than shipping’s contribution; population-level effects remain unconfirmed. ✅ grok: Supported—literature and NOAA reviews indicate overlap ≠ significant disruption at operational levels; construction noise is addressed with mitigation, and there are no links to deaths from wind operations. ⚠️ Hannibal999: Correct that dB are logarithmic and chronic noise matters, but evidence that wind farms raise regional noise floors enough to shrink baleen communication ranges is limited/uncertain; agencies note knowledge gaps and keep studying cumulative effects. ✅ grok: Accurate—NOAA’s IHA/Federal Register notices and FAQs state no evidence linking recent whale mortalities to offshore wind; impacts are expected to be minimal and mitigated, while cumulative effects are still being studied (GAO 2025).

About