TRACKING LAW
Region: US
Wednesday 02 July 2025 02:05:18 GMT
486
42
5
0
Music
Download
Comments
smail catic568 :
he he he ray ray and pooke
2025-07-02 13:11:26
1
Michael Thomas Turner :
You have to evaluate the call. yes, you may have received a call out here. The car could be a liar. The caller on this person could be enemies and he's just trying to cause trouble. what did you witness when you arrived on scene? did you witness a crime? did you see if the caller had any evidence of a crime? that's the investigation you need to be doing
2025-07-02 19:04:07
0
Farmer Ted :
When no crime has occurred or is reasonably suspected, calling the police to provoke their presence may serve as an intimidation tactic, particularly when done in coordination with law enforcement. Although officer presence is the first step in the use of force continuum, its misuse raises serious constitutional concerns. The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable seizures, and coercive police presence without cause may violate civil liberties. If done with others to suppress lawful conduct—such as filming in public—it may constitute conspiracy to violate rights under 18 U.S. Code § 241, a federal crime. As affirmed in United States v. Price (1966), officials acting under color of law can be criminally liable. A conviction requires only proof of an agreement and intent to deprive rights—not actual harm. In Glik v. Cunniffe, 655 F.3d 78 (2011), the First Circuit held that filming public officials in public is a “basic, vital, and well-established liberty” protected by the First Amendment.
2025-07-02 14:06:48
0
ABBY02 :
How about that an honest cop Hope he stays that way
2025-07-02 12:17:35
0
beach guy :
minus a crime no ID
2025-07-02 17:23:47
0
To see more videos from user @psychismlubricjvzi7, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
