William
Region: ES
Thursday 03 July 2025 14:04:05 GMT
612286
31958
1813
8635
Music
Download
Comments
JBK AFRIM :
It's unfortunate only the awakened can apprehend this message
2025-07-04 10:40:30
430
T.Muller :
Joshua Maponga never disappoints 💯
2025-07-03 18:26:09
468
Eagle’s 🦅 Nest :
Joseph could not have existed if the letter J ddnt exist in the languages of the original bible manuscripts. You can transcribe words but names must remain original….
2025-08-01 11:26:44
0
mercy# Church girl :
The confusion comes from the Language translation.Therefore, while "Jesus" is the name we commonly use, it's a translation and adaptation of the original Hebrew name, Yeshua. The closest transliteration would be something like Yeshua, yes. But language is complicated. The reason we say "Jesus" is that it went through several languages before arriving at English. It's not really a problem, we know who we're talking about, and it's not like the pronunciation of the name is what's important about his story.In English? Joshua. Jesus is weird and unique case of bad translation. Yeshua (יֵשׁוּעַ ) would be his name in Aramaic, which is what he would have spoken. That name itself would be a shortened version of the older Hebrew Yehoshua (יְהוֹשֻׁעַ ). Most people back then worked not have had last names, so he may have been known as either "son of Joseph", or by his home town, "of Nazareth". What makes the name Jesus unique is how it got to languages like English. The New Testament was written in Koine Greek, and his name was transliterated to Iesous (since there isn't a an actual equivalent of Yeshua in Greek). It was then transliterated again to Latin, with the spelling changing as the language did. Then English translations took the name from either Greek or Latin (though both were pretty similar). However, Yeshua has a direct translation into English without the extra steps in the middle, namely Joshua. And Jesus is unique as a name since every other name in the NT is a direct translation. For instance, Jesus's adoptive dad would not have called himself Joseph. His name in Aramaic would be Yosef (יוֹסֵף ). Am from africa(uganda) and in my local Language we call (yeshua/Jesus) yesu. it's still the same name but because of different Language translation. The writing change s and the letters but still means the same name. same name, different pronounce/translation but original meaning. Jesus is God and our God is the God of all Languages. it doesn't matter if you're white or black,from which country/ language. God doesn't discriminate people/ or languages.
2025-07-11 19:13:58
30
Big D :
Jesus is not an illusion,,, believe u me Jesus still exists,,, if you mention his name you're saved
2025-07-04 02:55:19
87
Jack Zolo 🚬🔫🇳🇦 :
I don't think Maponga is right to say Jesus is black or white , no one knows..
2025-07-29 21:47:15
0
Perfect kundiona :
why does the name of Jesus cause pain to evil spirits then, explain how evil spirits scream at the mere mention of the name Jesus
2025-07-03 20:41:17
106
Michael Abraham :
The statement “if God can not accept an African as an African then God is not the creator of the African”, sinks well in me. This is pure, undiluted pieces of truth.
2025-07-04 21:51:02
12
itstheafrican :
Jesus could as well be a consciousness
2025-08-01 08:15:05
0
ntuthukoncubemasu :
Jesus is the way,truth,and life
2025-07-16 07:17:23
2
didier.471 :
whether he is there or not, I believe in him
2025-07-12 04:45:47
12
Joseph Akpothu :
@mercy# Church girl:The confusion comes from the Language translation.Therefore, while "Jesus" is the name we commonly use, it's a translation and adaptation of the original Hebrew name, Yeshua. The closest transliteration would be something like Yeshua, yes. But language is complicated. The reason we say "Jesus" is that it went through several languages before arriving at English. It's not really a problem, we know who we're talking about, and it's not like the pronunciation of the name is what's important about his story.In English? Joshua. Jesus is weird and unique case of bad translation. Yeshua (יֵשׁוּעַ ) would be his name in Aramaic, which is what he would have spoken. That name itself would be a shortened version of the older Hebrew Yehoshua (יְהוֹשֻׁעַ ). Most people back then worked not have had last names, so he may have been known as either "son of Joseph", or by his home town, "of Nazareth". What makes the name Jesus unique is how it got to languages like English. The New Testament was written in Koine Greek, and his name was transliterated to Iesous (since there isn't a an actual equivalent of Yeshua in Greek). It was then transliterated again to Latin, with the spelling changing as the language did. Then English translations took the name from either Greek or Latin (though both were pretty similar). However, Yeshua has a direct translation into English without the extra steps in the middle, namely Joshua. And Jesus is unique as a name since every other name in the NT is a direct translation. For instance, Jesus's adoptive dad would not have called himself Joseph. His name in Aramaic would be Yosef (יוֹסֵף ). Am from africa(uganda) and in my local Language we call (yeshua/Jesus) yesu. it's still the same name but because of different Language translation. The writing change s and the letters but still means the same name. same name, different pronounce/translation but original meaning. Jesus is God and our God is the God of all Languages. it doesn't matter if you're white or black,from which country/ language. God doesn't discriminate people/ or languages.
2025-07-30 09:54:44
0
hemed :
this man is a legend 💪
2025-07-03 15:44:07
304
Rapharhnaamstuth Rapa Sewlah :
Maponga is being reckless here...only to fool the vulnerable. There is definitely God but he fools people to think there isn't because colonizers corrupted the truth. It's unfair to mislead people cos when their lives are disordered even here on earth facing he'll losing jobs and money this Maponga is not there to tell you what will actually help you.
2025-07-04 11:31:04
28
CHACHA MARLEY :
thanks for this new life you show people
2025-07-22 16:42:00
3
Soso Mai veVasikana 🦓🦓🦓 :
Awakening is important as Africans we are not ready.
2025-07-06 11:28:39
12
zulunhlonipho :
this man makes sense
2025-07-11 05:14:37
7
lawrencediphahe :
Jesus did only appear 500 years ago, but the letter J, and it's because in Hebrew he is known as Yeshua.
2025-07-18 11:30:59
6
decembervanwyk :
What does he believe in?
2025-07-12 04:57:11
4
Shimei_Empress :
My African people are not ready for this
2025-07-06 06:13:16
26
Theodore :
Before the letter J emerged, the letter "I" was used to represent the sound /dʒ/ or /j/ in Latin and early European scripts. - *Classical Latin:* The name "Jesus" would have been written as "IESVS" using the Latin alphabet. - *Middle English:* As the English language developed, the name "Jesus" was often written as "Iesus" or "Ihesus" before the letter J became standard. The letter I was used to represent the consonantal sound that J now represents in many names and words, including "Jesus". The distinction between I and J as separate letters developed over time, with J becoming a distinct letter in the English alphabet.
2025-07-11 18:44:02
0
Jah-Kiss Tha Wordsmith :
but the Jesus in the bible is not white
2025-07-15 02:28:15
4
Cathlyn :
but also the name Africa never existed 500 years ago.
2025-07-06 05:59:14
10
Chacha T :
So sad they killed everything about us and buried us but but but our ancestors spirits are still living within us they are awakening us and soon very soon our home our soil our land is going to be proud 🥹
2025-07-04 07:37:35
19
Jacob lovers :
Am proud to be black Africa and am following my ancestors blood
2025-07-26 16:19:04
3
To see more videos from user @william38788, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
