@cohen.489: don’t let this flop I had to say the words “oh I was gonna read that white nationalist paper that the Trump appointed judge gave the highest grade to that argues We the People doesn’t include anyone nonwhite and make a TikTok about it” when my college best friend I’m visiting asked if I had anything I wanted to do this morning #fyp #politics #law

Rachel Cohen
Rachel Cohen
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Sunday 13 July 2025 16:55:35 GMT
768450
115884
1768
3790

Music

Download

Comments

dylancole87
Dylan Cole :
Isn’t a racist argument a… bad argument?
2025-07-14 01:56:59
8104
sweetlimesnow
LuvMyCatPanchi2Much :
So ethics isn’t a factor in law school papers?
2025-07-13 18:08:51
12276
elllliante
Elllliante :
So this the critical race theory they like
2025-07-16 17:35:22
1
hiddekxgjdd
omeipyxl :
The single idea that an amendment can be unconstitutional should be grounds to fail the paper on its own.
2025-07-13 17:55:41
6503
victorianvice
Pyre H. 🇵🇸 :
My community college, which is part of a VERY small city, kicked out a student who did this btw. Just so we’re clear.
2025-07-14 02:47:05
3071
wstephanie
Stephanie Williams :
I don't think he's wrong
2025-07-15 16:51:08
1
heathenswan
Heathen :
He started with flawed premises due to a basic misunderstanding (misrepresentation?) of history. But conservatives think they have a right to their own options and their own reality sooo
2025-07-13 17:57:32
2552
nicholasgwin
Nicholas Gwin :
If your footnotes take up half the page…. You have little to offer. We have GOT to start taking writing and research skills more seriously in schools. I’m tired of college students who can format but not write. A well formatted paper ≠ well written
2025-07-13 18:15:34
393
hellllsyeah
erinrussell4995 :
I wrote some crazy premised papers in college. I could see this as an assignment based on an argument on something controversial or taboo (or an opposition paper on your personal ideals) to learn how to properly use adverse opinions in future works. I'm curious about the original assignment. also, you have the free speech to write the paper... the university has the responsibility to uphold their code of conduct/ethics, which to me, this paper is blatantly encouraging discrimination. but that's just me.
2025-07-16 13:09:40
1
understatementjones
user431892143883 :
I edited notes for YLJ, and let me tell you, I don't care what originalist knots you've twisted yourself in, if the argument of the paper is "America was racist at X time, therefore it's chill to be racist now," your argument is bad! If your conclusion is obviously wrong, it's much more likely there is *something* wrong with your premises or reasoning than that the obviously wrong conclusion is right.
2025-07-14 01:31:57
53
areallybadstarwarsfan
areallybadstarwarsfan 🆘🇺🇸🆘 :
I mean, the states that were forced to ratify could have just…not joined the Union, right? Does this mean that every peace treaty ever signed is also invalid if one of the countries involved had to sign said treaty in order to get the other guys to stop attacking them?
2025-07-13 17:28:51
652
mrteale
Lachlan Teale :
You should look into how Australia does free speech. You can have free speech as long as it’s not a hate crime and you’re not a bigot
2025-07-14 02:39:13
35
taikinabeauty
Taiiii :
I wrote a paper about the American dream being only accessible to the yt man & my professor did not like that 💀
2025-07-14 04:27:59
925
colossus_k8
Colossal G :
The thing is, even 'white' has changed overtime, because Italians and the Irish weren't considered yt in those times.
2025-07-14 05:07:31
445
gildedgoblin
Gilded Goblin :
A racist case study or paper fundamentally CANNOT be a good argument. By any definition of the word, it is absolutely biased and thus flawed due to the point of view of the author.
2025-07-14 18:00:39
748
brookebagnell
📚🪻🪴📖 :
It’s hilarious how they essentially applied DEI to his paper
2025-07-13 22:11:54
1500
brice.timmons2
Brice Timmons :
As a Leftist civil rights attorney, arguably specifically well-versed in the 14th Amendment, I'm thrilled about this paper. The student totally pulled the mask off both the Constitution and the Conservative legal movement. If I wrote the same thing but prefaced it, "What the Right believes is..." I would be ridiculed. I'm ecstatic that someone wrote this and that a FedSoc judge gave it an A+. I also think he's basically right and that all 3 of those constitutional Amendments were gutted, subverted by technicality, and never remotely enforced except by genuflection.
2025-07-13 21:43:00
30
krissyp23
Kristinlee_p732 :
As a lawyer, I struggle to understand how a racist argument could be considered a good argument.
2025-07-14 17:23:04
47
gatorray25
Ray 💕 :
As a UF alum, its so gd embarrassing that this is what my school has become in literally a handful of years. there are so many wonderful people and professors at UF and DeSantis is determined to ruin the university in his "war on woke"
2025-07-16 05:45:51
1
eponines_scream
Abhainn :
Cough cough Peter Theil cough Jordan Peterson coughhhh
2025-07-13 17:45:46
159
phippaaaa
Phippaaa :
Imagine the 250 years of the USA as a movie and that after the movie was screened it received countless awards, is hailed for its complex story of internal growth and hard fought victories leading to the finale challenging whether the main character can overcome the challenges that remain within them. Does it make sense to rip the films awards away because a small group of people argue the film should have ended before it began because it can’t get any better than the intro scenes? That the world would be better off without the movie because there is no possible way its first 10 seconds could be topped? I think any rational person would say no.
2025-07-14 15:31:57
1
socioradio
SocioRadio :
Sociology prof here and I COMPLETELY AGREE.
2025-07-13 20:44:33
8
dramaturge_r
dramaturge_r :
Even without the later amendments, he would have to prove that zero non-white people existed in freedom at the time the constitution was written and were excluded from constitutional rights at citizenship at that time. And he would, in fact, be unable to do this. So his argument is nullified from the get-go even before you include later amendments.
2025-07-14 18:06:11
1
anjali.ramanathan
Anjali | Style & Culture :
I’ve coached middle school debaters and they do a (far) better job of preempting obvious counterarguments.
2025-07-13 20:02:41
425
paxaugusta
A.B.C. :
Not only is marriage a scam, higher education is too. As one who has lived through both.
2025-07-16 04:48:05
1
To see more videos from user @cohen.489, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos


About