@ab_.odl: طيب🤘🏻..!! #دايمن #سلفاتور . . . #دايمن #viralt #foryoupage #tiktok #viraltiktok #tiktoki #fypシ゚viral #fyp #foryou #f

عبَود كاسلٓ

Open In TikTok:

Region: IQ

Saturday 19 July 2025 21:35:03 GMT

3871

352

13

37

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (0.55MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (0.81MB) Watermark .mp4 (0.87MB) Music .mp3

Comments

𝐷𝐴𝑅𝐾 :

مبدعع حبيبي

2025-07-21 15:25:56

0

هيٰثہٰـم39 :

حبيبي مبدع

2025-07-20 02:14:44

0

ياسر غرايمز :

ابداااع

2025-07-21 12:23:48

0

آبــو عبــد 🇮🇸 :

مبدع🌹

2025-07-19 21:37:53

1

حـسين :

مبدع عبود 🤍

2025-07-20 10:08:17

1

ابو جاسم :

مبدع يروحي

2025-07-20 09:30:42

1

منتظر :

مبدع

2025-07-20 02:41:43

1

حسين💀✨ :

مبدع حبيبي

2025-07-20 06:26:53

1

ابـــراهـيـم \'AO`\ :

❤❤❤

2025-07-20 08:58:07

0

To see more videos from user @ab_.odl, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

The lion king was hunting a buffalo but ran into big trouble. #wildanimals #animals #foryou

The lion king was hunting a buffalo but ran into big trouble. #wildanimals #animals #foryou

#капхед

Constitutional Clash: Trump Administration Defies Court Order on Venezuelan Deportations 🇺🇸⚖️ Brad Bernstein discusses the escalating constitutional crisis as President Donald Trump defies a federal court order to halt the deportation of Venezuelan nationals, raising significant questions about the separation of powers in the United States. Key Points: • Federal Court Intervention: On March 15, 2025, U.S. District Judge James E. Boasberg issued a 14-day temporary restraining order to halt the deportations of alleged Venezuelan gang members, citing concerns over the legality of using the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 for such actions and potential dangers the deportees might face upon return. • Administration’s Defiance: Despite the court’s directive, the Trump administration proceeded with the deportations, asserting that the judge’s order was issued after the flights had departed and questioning the judiciary’s authority in this context. • Constitutional Implications: This situation has sparked a constitutional debate regarding the balance of powers between the executive and judicial branches. Legal experts emphasize that if the administration disagrees with a court order, the appropriate response is to appeal through the judicial system, not to unilaterally disregard the order. • Judicial Response: Chief Justice John Roberts rebuked President Trump’s call for Judge Boasberg’s impeachment, stating that disagreement with a judge’s ruling is not grounds for impeachment, underscoring the importance of judicial independence. The administration’s actions have led to a constitutional crisis, challenging the foundational principles of checks and balances that underpin the U.S. government. The outcome of this dispute will have profound implications for the rule of law and the separation of powers in the United States. Stay informed about your rights and the evolving landscape of immigration law. Follow our page for the latest updates and legal insights. ##ConstitutionalCrisis##SeparationOfPowers##ImmigrationLaw##RuleOfLaw##BradBernstein

Constitutional Clash: Trump Administration Defies Court Order on Venezuelan Deportations 🇺🇸⚖️ Brad Bernstein discusses the escalating constitutional crisis as President Donald Trump defies a federal court order to halt the deportation of Venezuelan nationals, raising significant questions about the separation of powers in the United States. Key Points: • Federal Court Intervention: On March 15, 2025, U.S. District Judge James E. Boasberg issued a 14-day temporary restraining order to halt the deportations of alleged Venezuelan gang members, citing concerns over the legality of using the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 for such actions and potential dangers the deportees might face upon return. • Administration’s Defiance: Despite the court’s directive, the Trump administration proceeded with the deportations, asserting that the judge’s order was issued after the flights had departed and questioning the judiciary’s authority in this context. • Constitutional Implications: This situation has sparked a constitutional debate regarding the balance of powers between the executive and judicial branches. Legal experts emphasize that if the administration disagrees with a court order, the appropriate response is to appeal through the judicial system, not to unilaterally disregard the order. • Judicial Response: Chief Justice John Roberts rebuked President Trump’s call for Judge Boasberg’s impeachment, stating that disagreement with a judge’s ruling is not grounds for impeachment, underscoring the importance of judicial independence. The administration’s actions have led to a constitutional crisis, challenging the foundational principles of checks and balances that underpin the U.S. government. The outcome of this dispute will have profound implications for the rule of law and the separation of powers in the United States. Stay informed about your rights and the evolving landscape of immigration law. Follow our page for the latest updates and legal insights. ##ConstitutionalCrisis##SeparationOfPowers##ImmigrationLaw##RuleOfLaw##BradBernstein

Diml a day at homeee

Diml a day at homeee

About

Robot

Legal

Privacy Policy