@yourfutureexwife4: i actually do have an hourglass figure unlike about 75 percent of people on this trend claiming they do #fyp

Yourfutureexwife4🦋

Open In TikTok:

Region: US

Sunday 27 July 2025 00:45:40 GMT

490

27

0

0

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (0MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (0MB) Watermark .mp4 (0MB) Music .mp3

Comments

There are no more comments for this video.

To see more videos from user @yourfutureexwife4, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

الصلاة الصلاة واضب عليها #الصلاة #تارك_الصلاة #ارجع_صلي #الصلاة_ثم_الصلاة_ثم_الصلاة

الصلاة الصلاة واضب عليها #الصلاة #تارك_الصلاة #ارجع_صلي #الصلاة_ثم_الصلاة_ثم_الصلاة

Muốn bên a thật lâu .... mà a hổg có chịu 🤭🤭🤭#vairal #xuhuongtiktok #63tiengiangxinchao❤️ #đồngthap66 #CapCut

Muốn bên a thật lâu .... mà a hổg có chịu 🤭🤭🤭#vairal #xuhuongtiktok #63tiengiangxinchao❤️ #đồngthap66 #CapCut

හැබෑ වෙන්න ඕනෑම ඒවා 🥺❤️‍🩹 #kuku_page #viral #fypage #backgroundvideo #sinhalaquotes #100kviews #videvews #followers➕ #100kfollowers #freefollower💯 #bikelover #quotes

හැබෑ වෙන්න ඕනෑම ඒවා 🥺❤️‍🩹 #kuku_page #viral #fypage #backgroundvideo #sinhalaquotes #100kviews #videvews #followers➕ #100kfollowers #freefollower💯 #bikelover #quotes

#ايتهن_الاخوات_______الكريمات🌹💚🤍💚🤍💚🤍💚🤍💚🤍💚🤍💚🤍💚🤍💚🤍💚🤍💚🤍💚🤍💚🤍💚🤍💚🤍💚🌹

#ايتهن_الاخوات_______الكريمات🌹💚🤍💚🤍💚🤍💚🤍💚🤍💚🤍💚🤍💚🤍💚🤍💚🤍💚🤍💚🤍💚🤍💚🤍💚🤍💚🌹

Doubt me? Here’s the break down: Conservatives vs. Liberals: Charitable Giving Breakdown Monetary Donations: Conservatives donate ~$300 billion annually, outpacing liberals’ ~$200 billion. On average, conservatives give 3–4% of their income, while liberals contribute 1–2%. This gap stems from conservatives’ strong religious ties, with 60–73% of their donations supporting churches and faith-based causes. Liberals, often more secular, prioritize systemic change, which may reduce direct financial giving. Urban liberal cities also face higher living costs, limiting disposable income for charity. Volunteer Time: Conservatives log ~3 billion volunteer hours yearly, compared to liberals’ ~2 billion. Per person, conservatives volunteer 20–35 hours annually, while liberals average 12–15 hours. Conservative communities, often smaller and faith-driven, foster hands-on involvement in local causes. Liberals, while active in advocacy, tend to focus less on direct volunteering, possibly due to urban lifestyles or emphasis on broader social movements. Other Contributions: Conservatives lead in blood donations, giving 45% more than liberals. They also support more local nonprofits per capita in conservative-leaning cities. Liberals excel in advocacy efforts, like public campaigns or policy pushes, but these are less tangible than conservatives’ direct contributions, such as food drives or community service. Why the Difference?: Conservatives’ giving is rooted in religious duty and community ties, especially in smaller cities where personal connections drive action. Liberals, often in larger urban centers, may prioritize public displays of empathy (virtue-signaling) or systemic reform over immediate aid. Speculatively, cultural pressures push liberals to appear compassionate, while conservatives’ quieter, faith-based ethos yields measurable impact. City Comparison: Of the top 15 philanthropic cities (e.g., Minneapolis, Seattle, St. Louis), only four are liberal-leaning (Seattle, Boston, San Diego, San Francisco). Conservative cities (72%) outperform liberal ones in charitable metrics, despite liberal cities having larger populations (~51.2 million vs. ~21.6 million for conservative cities). Conservative cities’ higher per-capita giving and volunteering rates overshadow liberal cities’ totals, which are boosted by wealthier populations but diluted by lower individual contributions. Population Context: The 72% of conservative cities (pop. ~21.6 million) outgive liberal and neutral cities (pop. ~51.2 million), with a population difference of ~29.6 million. Conservatives’ focus on direct, local impact contrasts with liberals’ broader, less personal approach.

Doubt me? Here’s the break down: Conservatives vs. Liberals: Charitable Giving Breakdown Monetary Donations: Conservatives donate ~$300 billion annually, outpacing liberals’ ~$200 billion. On average, conservatives give 3–4% of their income, while liberals contribute 1–2%. This gap stems from conservatives’ strong religious ties, with 60–73% of their donations supporting churches and faith-based causes. Liberals, often more secular, prioritize systemic change, which may reduce direct financial giving. Urban liberal cities also face higher living costs, limiting disposable income for charity. Volunteer Time: Conservatives log ~3 billion volunteer hours yearly, compared to liberals’ ~2 billion. Per person, conservatives volunteer 20–35 hours annually, while liberals average 12–15 hours. Conservative communities, often smaller and faith-driven, foster hands-on involvement in local causes. Liberals, while active in advocacy, tend to focus less on direct volunteering, possibly due to urban lifestyles or emphasis on broader social movements. Other Contributions: Conservatives lead in blood donations, giving 45% more than liberals. They also support more local nonprofits per capita in conservative-leaning cities. Liberals excel in advocacy efforts, like public campaigns or policy pushes, but these are less tangible than conservatives’ direct contributions, such as food drives or community service. Why the Difference?: Conservatives’ giving is rooted in religious duty and community ties, especially in smaller cities where personal connections drive action. Liberals, often in larger urban centers, may prioritize public displays of empathy (virtue-signaling) or systemic reform over immediate aid. Speculatively, cultural pressures push liberals to appear compassionate, while conservatives’ quieter, faith-based ethos yields measurable impact. City Comparison: Of the top 15 philanthropic cities (e.g., Minneapolis, Seattle, St. Louis), only four are liberal-leaning (Seattle, Boston, San Diego, San Francisco). Conservative cities (72%) outperform liberal ones in charitable metrics, despite liberal cities having larger populations (~51.2 million vs. ~21.6 million for conservative cities). Conservative cities’ higher per-capita giving and volunteering rates overshadow liberal cities’ totals, which are boosted by wealthier populations but diluted by lower individual contributions. Population Context: The 72% of conservative cities (pop. ~21.6 million) outgive liberal and neutral cities (pop. ~51.2 million), with a population difference of ~29.6 million. Conservatives’ focus on direct, local impact contrasts with liberals’ broader, less personal approach.

About

Robot

Legal

Privacy Policy