templar absolutely obliterates the samurai in every scenario
2025-07-29 07:44:26
8
Shyhand :
Samurai swords were not built to go through chainmail.. the only way the samurai wins if he can get underneath because he's a lot more flexible and quicker.. odds are favor to the temple
2025-07-29 15:48:25
0
darryla2003yahooc :
the knight with the shield would give the advantage
2025-07-27 19:45:27
2
LilChola124512 :
Traditional katanas are closer to 40”’s in total 🤝
2025-07-27 18:59:11
1
wondering.somewhere :
Katanas can’t cut amor because they are too thin, they would shatter instantly upon collision
2025-07-28 08:19:59
2
Darth_Rathious :
the samurai were also highly skilled archers too.
2025-07-27 20:34:51
5
itsgxiigdotflhckh itcig hkckhc :
do a French cuirassier vs tamplar knight
2025-07-27 18:22:17
2
Chris Cade :
Katana not designed to deal with plate armor so it would not last long in the fight.
2025-07-28 01:16:10
0
Λουκια Σταρη :
samurai all the eay
2025-07-29 16:51:02
0
Saru :
Haven't watched it. But knight sweeps. He isn't an unarmed peasant so the samurai is at a severe disadvantage
2025-07-28 00:21:38
17
Grim1 :
This is not actually what would happen
2025-07-28 08:44:11
1
___The_Sith___ :
No ..The European back then was so infected with diseases that he would win by passing the infections over to the Japanese samurai and in turn most of Japan 😂😂
2025-07-29 13:43:54
0
William Patton :
I would say the knight would win because the katana is a slashing weapon. knight armory built to ll withstand slashing weapons most effectively. that why you see war hammers, very pointy swords back in medieval times
2025-07-27 22:08:37
4
s889010 :
Katanas are not designed to damage heavy armour..very light.Templars are trained to fight all there life
2025-07-29 15:29:06
1
tmrarose50 :
I'm voting for the Tpler . Shields are a great advantage in 1 on 1 fights
2025-07-28 00:09:13
2
Bob🪶🐴💉 :
The Templar would win because the samurai is sheathed
2025-07-30 07:26:31
1
Cyroosky👺🤜 :
Samurai mainly use bows and only use their sword for emergencies or close combat
2025-07-28 03:46:14
5
HawaiianGorilla379 :
knight has multiple advantages over the samurai such as armor and most weaponry the one that would be a problem would be the samurai bow as they use it on foot and horseback and the kanabo the heavy club against his shield however knights ain't slow for me a percentage would be around 70/30 for the knight
2025-07-28 22:01:35
0
briingtheruckus :
Every Templar was the same size? Wild
2025-07-27 20:21:47
9
Swiss cheese 🧀 :
Templar easily, it's not even close
2025-07-29 03:30:33
0
brokenskull :
I want to see Robin hood against a knight.
2025-07-29 23:25:49
0
Jexus13 :
Samurai were originally horseback archers.
2025-07-28 02:34:36
1
Meta :
i would say samurai,they were skilled .Templar was to heavy bit was a killer top.
2025-07-29 08:39:25
0
Eric Gallagher535 :
Yeah. Knights were EXTREMELY well versed in close quarters combat. A rondel dagger in the gaps of the armor was often the only way they were brought down
2025-07-28 23:14:24
1
Bruno :
can you do a Polish/Lithuanian Hussars?
2025-07-27 18:25:32
0
To see more videos from user @ducklingsproductions, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.