@しひみら れう のつも 🇰🇭:Thailand has never acted as an aggressor. Throughout history, we have exercised restraint and patience in the face of repeated provocations by both Cambodian military forces and civilians. It is therefore unjust to claim that Thailand was the first to open fire. What possible justification would Thailand have to initiate hostilities? As Cambodia has often described itself as a small nation, it would be illogical for Thailand to provoke conflict and invite international condemnation.
Thailand's actions were taken solely in defense of its citizens. Cambodian forces fired indiscriminately into areas populated by innocent civilians—people with no involvement in the conflict and completely unarmed. Lives full of promise and future potential were tragically lost due to these indiscriminate and inhumane attacks.
Among the victims were children, the elderly, and ordinary civilians, none of whom bore arms or posed any threat. Shockingly, even hospitals were not spared. Cambodian forces fired upon medical facilities without regard for the patients, doctors, and medical personnel within. This, despite the fact that numerous Cambodian citizens have previously received medical treatment in Thai hospitals.
Cambodia’s actions demonstrate a grave disregard for humanitarian principles and a lack of moral conscience. Such conduct cannot be justified under any circumstance and stands in stark violation of international norms and human rights.
2025-07-28 10:04:59
31
Sevenbank :
สินติวิธีคงไม่ใช่ทางออก
2025-07-28 09:57:05
1084
หญิงบัวพาเลาะ :
Thailand didn't start the conflict.
Satellite data from independent institutions like ASPI (Australian Strategic Policy Institute) clearly show that Cambodia built over 100 military structures near the border before Thailand made any move.
Thailand's responses were limited, defensive, and much later.
This conflict is more about Cambodia’s internal politics than actual aggression from Thailand.
::
::
#SaveThailand. #CambodiaOpeningFireFiret #CambodiaAttackingHospital