1. Home
  2. Detail

@socomedia01: Padre não pode da opinião #comediahumor

SÓ COMÉDIA01
SÓ COMÉDIA01
Open In TikTok:
Region: BR
Saturday 23 August 2025 04:01:49 GMT
121139
8055
427
1433

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (2MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (2MB) Watermark .mp4 (2.15MB) Music .mp3

Comments

rodrigovieira1902
Rodrigo Vieira :
o padre se arrependeu amargamente em ter ido no podcast .kkkkk
2025-08-24 11:58:47
59
twkdhwosnd
Falcão :
Vamos parar 😂😂😂
2025-08-23 07:26:41
28
paulocesar.18itao
paulo cesar viana :
Kkkkkkkkk
2025-10-21 16:13:07
1
vagnerxavier530
silva :
kkkk
2025-09-05 22:37:26
1
agmonsousasantos
Agmon sousa :
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 mano
2025-08-23 20:41:38
3
darley.silva261
@Darley Silva :
a cara do padre se perguntano oq eu vim fazer aqui kkk
2025-09-04 01:32:44
11
marcossantanaventura
marcossantanavent :
🤣🤣🤣🤣 sacanagen
2025-08-25 09:33:34
2
userjfp2021
João Ferreira :
VERDADE KKKKKKK
2025-09-07 13:42:06
2
mersonjose
mersonjose :
verdade 🤣🤣🤣
2025-09-01 11:39:53
1
gislenesaldanha797982
Gislene Silva :
tenho a mesma opinião...se não casa não sabe
2025-09-07 03:46:05
2
ivan13lopes
Ivan :
kkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
2025-09-09 10:38:25
1
franciscoborba332
franciscoborba332 :
😂😂😂😂😂 vamos parar 😂😂😂
2025-09-05 02:15:20
4
luis.carlos0367
Luis Carlos :
kkkkkkkkkk
2025-09-06 11:47:40
1
edson.antonio782
Nenem :
muito bom 😂😂😂😂
2025-10-12 16:14:49
1
o.gg540
o gg :
kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
2025-10-08 11:54:30
1
allex.almeida6
Allex almeida :
Kkkkkkk
2025-08-23 21:09:33
0
tacyosimplicio
Tacyo Simplicio :
essa foi boa kkkk
2025-08-24 03:23:33
4
marinalvamendes285
marinalvamendes285 :
kkkkkkkkkkkkk
2025-09-19 11:36:53
1
geovanemartins664
geovanemartins664 :
kkkkk
2025-09-02 14:42:47
1
celso.henrique.15
Celso Henrique 15 :
que isso 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
2025-08-25 11:15:03
4
janinemendes32
Janine Mendes :
Rachei 🤣🤣🤣
2025-08-24 03:47:43
4
paulo.rafael.cerq
Paulo Rafael Cerqueira :
eu penso assim também
2025-09-06 16:16:02
2
bigzgeladinhogourmet
big :
kkkkkkkkkkk
2025-09-05 13:58:56
1
loirindexter
Loirin Dexter :
kkkkkkkkkk
2025-08-29 15:30:44
1
brunoleal074
Bruno . :
esses 2 kkkkkkkk
2025-09-09 16:15:29
1
To see more videos from user @socomedia01, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

The story of us ✨ @KPJ Kajang Specialist Hospital
The story of us ✨ @KPJ Kajang Specialist Hospital
Walahar di guyur hujan sore ini #foryou #fyp #bendunganwalaharkarawang #infokarawang
Walahar di guyur hujan sore ini #foryou #fyp #bendunganwalaharkarawang #infokarawang
สวยมากกก🔥 #mcjeans #mc #รองเท้าแตะmc #รองเท้าแตะmcjeans #รองเท้าmc #mcjeansstafflotusสตึก
สวยมากกก🔥 #mcjeans #mc #รองเท้าแตะmc #รองเท้าแตะmcjeans #รองเท้าmc #mcjeansstafflotusสตึก
Replying to @terri.jones459 Trying to answer this question the best I can. Are any of my other warriors on pain? #kidneystone #painmanagement #KIDNEYDISEASE
Replying to @terri.jones459 Trying to answer this question the best I can. Are any of my other warriors on pain? #kidneystone #painmanagement #KIDNEYDISEASE
#joyuri #edit #fyp #pitbullterrier #viral
#joyuri #edit #fyp #pitbullterrier #viral
The Supreme Court ruled 6–3 on Wednesday to uphold a Tennessee law that bans gender-affirming care for minors experiencing gender dysphoria, shielding similar laws in more than 25 other states. The question before the court was whether the state law — which encompasses puberty blockers, hormone therapy and surgery with the goal of medically transitioning a minor’s gender — violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the majority, acknowledged the “fierce” scientific and policy debates surrounding the treatments “in an evolving field,” but said those matters were best left for the people to decide. “Our role is not ‘to judge the wisdom, fairness, or logic’ of the law before us, but only to ensure that it does not violate the equal protection guarantee of the Fourteenth Amendment,” he wrote. “Having concluded it does not, we leave questions regarding its policy to the people, their elected representatives, and the democratic process.” Tennessee lawmakers enacted the ban in 2023, citing a “compelling interest” to protect minors from physical and emotional harm. Three Tennessee families and a doctor sued, and the Biden administration joined them, arguing the law amounted to sex discrimination. The high court rejected that argument, saying the law distinguishes based on a treatment’s medical purpose, not sex. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, writing for the court’s liberal wing in a blistering dissent, said the decision would cause “irrevocable damage” to the Equal Protection Clause and invite legislatures to engage in discrimination. “By retreating from meaningful judicial review exactly where it matters most, the court abandons transgender children and their families to political whims. In sadness, I dissent,” she wrote. #supremecourt #scotus #transgender #cspan
The Supreme Court ruled 6–3 on Wednesday to uphold a Tennessee law that bans gender-affirming care for minors experiencing gender dysphoria, shielding similar laws in more than 25 other states. The question before the court was whether the state law — which encompasses puberty blockers, hormone therapy and surgery with the goal of medically transitioning a minor’s gender — violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the majority, acknowledged the “fierce” scientific and policy debates surrounding the treatments “in an evolving field,” but said those matters were best left for the people to decide. “Our role is not ‘to judge the wisdom, fairness, or logic’ of the law before us, but only to ensure that it does not violate the equal protection guarantee of the Fourteenth Amendment,” he wrote. “Having concluded it does not, we leave questions regarding its policy to the people, their elected representatives, and the democratic process.” Tennessee lawmakers enacted the ban in 2023, citing a “compelling interest” to protect minors from physical and emotional harm. Three Tennessee families and a doctor sued, and the Biden administration joined them, arguing the law amounted to sex discrimination. The high court rejected that argument, saying the law distinguishes based on a treatment’s medical purpose, not sex. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, writing for the court’s liberal wing in a blistering dissent, said the decision would cause “irrevocable damage” to the Equal Protection Clause and invite legislatures to engage in discrimination. “By retreating from meaningful judicial review exactly where it matters most, the court abandons transgender children and their families to political whims. In sadness, I dissent,” she wrote. #supremecourt #scotus #transgender #cspan

About

Legal