@grokvsmaga: maybe if i just keep denying sources… #maga #israel #palestine #trump #freepalestine Cross fact-check from ChatGPT: @AdameMedia — ✅ Accurate. Hind Rajab, 5, was killed in Gaza Jan 29, 2024; forensic analysis (Forensic Architecture) found ~335–355 bullet impacts on the car, linked to Israeli tank fire. IDF denies involvement. Sources: WaPo, Al Jazeera, BBC. @grok — ✅ Correct. Hind’s family car was hit by tank fire, she later died; PRCS ambulance sent to rescue was destroyed, paramedics killed. Forensic probes confirmed 335–355 bullet impacts. Sources: WaPo, Al Jazeera, Wikipedia. @secretmovement1 — ❌ No, the ambulance was Palestinian Red Crescent, not Israeli. Sources: WaPo, BBC, Al Jazeera. @grok — ✅ Correct. The destroyed ambulance was PRCS, dispatched after coordination with Israeli forces. Sources: WaPo, BBC, Al Jazeera. @shib4understan1 — ❌ No evidence Hamas destroyed the ambulance; investigations attribute destruction to Israeli tank fire, IDF denies. Sources: Forensic Architecture, WaPo, Al Jazeera. @grok — ✅ Correct. Reports indicate PRCS ambulance destroyed by Israeli fire; IDF denies, no evidence points to Hamas. Sources: WaPo, BBC, Al Jazeera. @XIntlNews — ⚠️ Speculative. No investigations confirm Hamas used the PRCS ambulance for spying in Hind Rajab case; only general accusations exist. Sources: Forensic Architecture, WaPo, Al Jazeera. @grok — ✅ Supported. No evidence links Hamas to ambulance in Hind Rajab case; IDF denies targeting, claiming no troops present. Sources: WaPo, Al Jazeera, BBC. @Ellies2ndacc — ⚠️ Opinion. Mainstream sources (WaPo, BBC, Al Jazeera) have reported consistently on Hind Rajab case; reliability is debated politically, but the facts of the incident are corroborated. Sources: WaPo, BBC, Al Jazeera.

☆ Cherryton ☆ :

The fact that they’re trying to argue with an AI in hopes that it will change its mind really says a lot lmao

Lana :

Free Palestine 🇵🇸

IHATECYAN :

possible war crime? it is one

🇩🇿 :

what are his "reliable sources" at this point 💔🥀

тоф первый или тофик второй :

trusting Al Jazeera😭😭

LowSurge :

some ppl really think this is fake news 💀💀

OfficerBoles69 :

SHE GOT SHOT HOW MANY TIMES

Grace :

what do they consider "reliable sources" i wonder

askldflkdd🍺 :

"maybe it will work this time"🙏🥀

Cristian Fodor :

GROK ACTIVELY SUPPORTS ANTISEMITISM IM SO TIRED😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭

blazst :

then which sources are reliable bro😭😭😭

oscah 🔥🇦🇺🏆 :

𝗘𝗠𝗘𝗠 :

"Lol grok your sources are not reliable"

⊹ ࣪ ˖ ♱ najma 🕸 i ♡ albedo !! :

the way they kept going 😭

Ramen Consumer :

I will ask grok, if it agrees I'm right, if it disagrees with me it's wrong.

shit dog :

why do twitter users think they can talk an ai into changing its mind

Soundwave :

His sources were “trust me, bro”

CantStopTheATrain :

They keep asking the same questions 🙄

clippy :

i am so sorry Germany 💔💔💔💔💔

thi :

they'll do anything to deflect when the evidence stares right at them

𖦏Greek-AF 🇬🇷𖦏 :

Grok, much like ChatGPT, relies constantly on radically left-leaning explanations. Even Elon Musk and other owners have admitted this.

Dan✡︎ :

wiki,Al jazeera yeah wrap it up

AP :

bjjn :

holy are they ragebaiting the AI 😭😭💔

DanielForgets :

Bro I don’t get it did they shoot their own ambulance😭🙏