SassGoblin🇨🇦 :
If you’re not getting a 1:1 firsthand initial assessment complete with subjective and objective history of presenting problem, current symptomatology, psychiatric/social/medical history, collateral info from talking to the patient, their family members, or written documentation from the medical records to formulate a possible, differential, or tentative diagnosis, then you shouldn’t be abusing your clinical skills by making monetized TikTok content by speculating on it at all. Screen recorded clips of Live streams and past videos are insufficient sources, even when it’s the subject themselves making them. You are seeing a fraction of the picture. Any clinician who says they “can” and that it’s “just educational and not diagnosing” therefore not unethical is arrogant and damaging public perception of their health care role, especially if you are disclosing your professional role, weaponizing the authority it holds in a way where you think you can’t be held accountable (like deliberately misreporting what jurisdiction you work🙄) If anyone does the above to make a buck off their clinical skills to supplement their income or gain access to the tiktok creator fund, they should have their professional ethics reviewed by governing body, regardless of it being in California 💁🏻♀️or say New Jersey, even. 🙄 I collected 20GB of digital data evidence and I definitely will follow through
2025-09-10 00:23:01