Insidecarlathoughts
Region: US
Wednesday 10 September 2025 23:18:53 GMT
257
21
5
0
Music
Download
Comments
Mr. Black’s Boutique :
Charlie Kirk
2025-09-10 23:53:47
2
Slimtee1900 :
Charlie Kirk
2025-09-11 00:55:54
0
Trinacoleman1224 :
And the answer is? Charlie kirk
2025-09-11 01:04:19
1
RCGrunt :
It is ok... Your comprehension skills are sub par. You're taking everything out of context. He said no such thing in the way you want a certain groups of people of low understanding to perceive it. He was talking about CRIMINALS in general. He also was trying to get BLACK PEOPLE to see outside the box that WE are our own demise my flaming the VICTIM MENTALITY when voting 'DEMAQUACKS' for the last 60 years have FAILED black people the idea that DEI was black folk FAVOR after AFFIRMATIVE ACTION when really it was original for LIBRAL WHITE WOMEN. Now I will attempt to fiddle faddle your misunderstanding of the 2nd amendment and what Charlie K was trying to intelligently convey. I'm doing this knowing it's going to fly over some of yallz heads. I disagree with people associating Charlie's 2nd amendment stance with his unfortunate passing. I think this confuses types of weapons and types of shootings. The arguments for gun control are typically associated with mass shootings. We all know the story. Someone gets an AR-15, or some type of gun with high magazine capacity, to end as many lives as possible. The indiscriminate harm in theory can be reduced by restricting certain types of guns. This does make sense. Slower fire guns or guns with smaller magazines reduce the time period to cause indiscriminate harm. However, Charlie's situation is very different: A single shot was fired. No one else was targeted at the shooting. The weapon used was a long range weapon with a slow rate of fire and very small magazine capacity. This type of shot requires training and accuracy, likely acquired through a legal form of training or permits. (Note: not confirmed, but my judgement) This reeks of political assassination! It would be very hard to have gun control laws prevent this because: It would require banning nearly all guns, which is far more difficult than what gun control advocates call for. Assassinations can be carried out with many types of weapons, when the focus is a single person. The light rail murder is an example. To change my view, you can present ideas or evidence of how a gun control law could have prevented this incident.
2025-09-11 05:36:26
0
To see more videos from user @insidecarlasthought, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
