BSOLZ
Region: US
Friday 03 October 2025 00:16:39 GMT
4558
294
31
5
Music
Download
Comments
Darryl Bradley :
From a practical sense, hell no. On order to win a title, you have to be good for a longer period of time and that involves many factors that are outside of your control.
2025-10-03 04:39:29
0
Osama :
Depends on what role you had for your team and the teams you faced in the playoffs. For example I rather be 06 wade winning the championship averaging 34 points in the finals.
2025-10-03 00:53:38
26
Jah :
I feel like bro just defending d roses MVP 💔🥀
2025-10-26 00:48:21
0
Matty :
I agree. And voters fatigue completely ruins it. Biased Nuggets fan so I’m also just salty about Embid
2025-10-03 02:14:07
0
JD :
I’d say winning a 2nd to 3rd MVP is more impressive due to their being such a voter fatigue after winning 1
2025-10-03 00:21:37
14
Aris Talion :
It’s a media votes,compare to championship,
2025-10-03 07:45:03
0
dreams_2241 :
They both hard but I think winning a mvp is harder because it’s in individual award
2025-10-03 09:13:43
1
hicraccman :
You still need luck to win mvp cause you gotta be great and hope the narrative is on your side
2025-10-03 06:11:43
2
grast :
A) The game is played to win championships. That’s the ultimate objective measure of success. B) MVPs, by contrast, are subjective. The criteria shift year to year, and the award doesn’t always go to the best player — it goes to the player enough voters agree on. Take Russ’s MVP: I would argue Harden was more deserving that season. Championships cut through that subjectivity. We know who won. We know who had the ability to lead a team to the top.
2025-10-03 18:04:18
0
BeFrBruhQuitPlayinWithMe :
Keep in mind, Nikola Tokić won a championship without playing a second, also, only 35 recorded players have won a regular season MVP
2025-10-03 03:07:14
1
ThatWAGE :
Not all MVPs and championships are equal, 2011 Mavs and unanimous MVP Steph
2025-10-03 14:41:19
0
trevon555 :
Winning multiple mvps without a chip is the hardest thing to do in sports. They gonna pull every trick in the book 2 not give you the award
2025-10-07 22:20:57
0
Austin Hein :
Depends on how impactful you were to your championship. But MVPs should be the better option
2025-10-03 21:09:36
0
Benny :
you lost me at luck. that's just coping at that point
2025-10-03 05:32:19
0
cl5rys :
wbk mvp > chip
2025-10-03 13:45:17
0
Q Dawg :
Winning an mvp is heavily influenced by media narratives. People can talk about “mvp” worthy seasons like what Chris Paul and 2011 bron. They were second place but will get not even 5% the credit if a real mvp even though they were at least 90% close to winning
2025-10-03 13:28:54
0
i_cri_errytime :
MVPs have narratives factor into how/why voters for the winner. So the best player doesn’t ALWAYS win mvp, and sometimes they win mvps they don’t deserve as an apology. The best player on a Championship team is much more obvious, so winning a chip as the best player is more impressive
2025-10-03 01:22:20
0
realdunkeyfromshrek :
depends. Id rather be 06 wade than nash. 11 dirk than rose. 20 bron than giannis 23 jokic than embiid etc
2025-10-03 18:01:55
0
Ankit Karan :
depends your contributing factor. like an 06 wade or 03 duncan is more impressive to me than 18 harden
2025-10-03 01:19:21
0
To see more videos from user @bsolz_, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
