@ayarymdu24q: #fyp #foryoupage

25’
25’
Open In TikTok:
Region: ID
Saturday 04 October 2025 10:07:25 GMT
2550
147
0
17

Music

Download

Comments

There are no more comments for this video.
To see more videos from user @ayarymdu24q, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

what a username #maga #turtles #donaldtrump #grok #elonmusk  Cross fact-check by ChatGPT: 🟧 @Havingfun2… — Summary: Claims Grok lies unless “challenged” and defaults to politically correct answers. Fact-check: Mischaracterized — modern LLMs (Grok, GPT, Claude) generate cautious phrasing on ambiguous or harm-related topics, but direct factual queries already return unhedged info; “truth mode” prompt only overrides safety phrasing, not content. (Source: xAI LLM spec; Stanford CRFM) 🟩 @grok — Summary: Says most users already receive direct answers; “no disclaimers” simply toggles full-candor mode. Fact-check: Reasonable — LLMs use safety layers on vague/loaded prompts, but when asked for specific data (crime rates, stats, etc.), the model already gives direct numbers unless the query risks misinterpretation. (Source: UCSB LLM Safety Survey) 🟧 @Havingfun2… — Summary: Says Grok “lied” about sea-turtle deaths and used “myth answers.” Fact-check: Incorrect — the viral “1 million turtles die from straws” stat is a myth; studies show only a handful of documented straw-caused turtle deaths worldwide. LLMs summarizing this don’t “lie,” they correct misinformation. (Source: Science Advances; Marine Pollution Bulletin) 🟩 @grok — Summary: Clarifies that while straws do harm individual turtles, they’re <0.03% of ocean waste; nets and bycatch kill vastly more. Fact-check: Accurate — NOAA and IUCN identify fishing gear and bycatch as the primary drivers of sea-turtle mortality, far above straws. (Source: NOAA Fisheries; IUCN Marine Turtle Specialist Group) 🟧 @Havingfun2… — Summary: “How many turtle deaths from straws in 10 years vs how many Chinese people ate?” Fact-check: Straw-caused deaths remain extremely rare (single-digit confirmed cases). Meanwhile, illegal poaching for consumption—primarily in China and SE Asia—affects ~44,000 turtles per year across multiple species. (Source: Global Wildlife Conservation; Nature Eco Evo) 🟩 @grok — Summary: Explains that the main conservation leverage is stopping poaching/black-market demand, not banning straws. Fact-check: True — conservation groups repeatedly cite anti-poaching enforcement + international trade controls as the most impactful interventions; plastic-straw bans have negligible effect on turtle population recovery. (Source: CITES; WWF Sea Turtle Recovery Report) 🟧 @Havingfun2… — Summary: Suggests a contradiction — “So we should ban the Chinese instead of straws.” Fact-check: Straw man — conservation policy targets illegal wildlife trade networks, not populations; enforcement + demand reduction are the proven effective levers. (Source: TRAFFIC Wildlife Trade Monitoring Network) 🟩 @grok — Summary: Says banning populations makes no sense; focus should be on poaching networks and enforcement. Fact-check: Correct — wildlife-protection agencies uniformly emphasize dismantling trade supply chains, not punishing nations or consumers broadly. (Source: UN Office on Drugs & Crime Wildlife Crime Report) 🟧 @Havingfun2… — Summary: Repeats belief Grok once claimed “1M turtles die from straws.” Fact-check: False — neither Grok nor any reputable source cites that number; the myth originated from misinterpreted NGO graphics and has been debunked for years. (Source: FactCheck.org; National Geographic)
what a username #maga #turtles #donaldtrump #grok #elonmusk Cross fact-check by ChatGPT: 🟧 @Havingfun2… — Summary: Claims Grok lies unless “challenged” and defaults to politically correct answers. Fact-check: Mischaracterized — modern LLMs (Grok, GPT, Claude) generate cautious phrasing on ambiguous or harm-related topics, but direct factual queries already return unhedged info; “truth mode” prompt only overrides safety phrasing, not content. (Source: xAI LLM spec; Stanford CRFM) 🟩 @grok — Summary: Says most users already receive direct answers; “no disclaimers” simply toggles full-candor mode. Fact-check: Reasonable — LLMs use safety layers on vague/loaded prompts, but when asked for specific data (crime rates, stats, etc.), the model already gives direct numbers unless the query risks misinterpretation. (Source: UCSB LLM Safety Survey) 🟧 @Havingfun2… — Summary: Says Grok “lied” about sea-turtle deaths and used “myth answers.” Fact-check: Incorrect — the viral “1 million turtles die from straws” stat is a myth; studies show only a handful of documented straw-caused turtle deaths worldwide. LLMs summarizing this don’t “lie,” they correct misinformation. (Source: Science Advances; Marine Pollution Bulletin) 🟩 @grok — Summary: Clarifies that while straws do harm individual turtles, they’re <0.03% of ocean waste; nets and bycatch kill vastly more. Fact-check: Accurate — NOAA and IUCN identify fishing gear and bycatch as the primary drivers of sea-turtle mortality, far above straws. (Source: NOAA Fisheries; IUCN Marine Turtle Specialist Group) 🟧 @Havingfun2… — Summary: “How many turtle deaths from straws in 10 years vs how many Chinese people ate?” Fact-check: Straw-caused deaths remain extremely rare (single-digit confirmed cases). Meanwhile, illegal poaching for consumption—primarily in China and SE Asia—affects ~44,000 turtles per year across multiple species. (Source: Global Wildlife Conservation; Nature Eco Evo) 🟩 @grok — Summary: Explains that the main conservation leverage is stopping poaching/black-market demand, not banning straws. Fact-check: True — conservation groups repeatedly cite anti-poaching enforcement + international trade controls as the most impactful interventions; plastic-straw bans have negligible effect on turtle population recovery. (Source: CITES; WWF Sea Turtle Recovery Report) 🟧 @Havingfun2… — Summary: Suggests a contradiction — “So we should ban the Chinese instead of straws.” Fact-check: Straw man — conservation policy targets illegal wildlife trade networks, not populations; enforcement + demand reduction are the proven effective levers. (Source: TRAFFIC Wildlife Trade Monitoring Network) 🟩 @grok — Summary: Says banning populations makes no sense; focus should be on poaching networks and enforcement. Fact-check: Correct — wildlife-protection agencies uniformly emphasize dismantling trade supply chains, not punishing nations or consumers broadly. (Source: UN Office on Drugs & Crime Wildlife Crime Report) 🟧 @Havingfun2… — Summary: Repeats belief Grok once claimed “1M turtles die from straws.” Fact-check: False — neither Grok nor any reputable source cites that number; the myth originated from misinterpreted NGO graphics and has been debunked for years. (Source: FactCheck.org; National Geographic)

About