@mallan.amadou.nas:

Mallan.Amadou.Nassirou
Mallan.Amadou.Nassirou
Open In TikTok:
Region: NG
Sunday 05 October 2025 11:18:54 GMT
722
11
6
1

Music

Download

Comments

user31714543425015
MD Nirav Shaikh :
$200000
2025-10-12 18:29:44
0
sohid.ahmed158
Sohid Ahmed :
🤲🤲🤲
2025-10-05 13:26:27
1
pmdk.bireoma
Pmdk Bireoma :
2025-10-24 19:26:01
0
moussa.blmetougre
Moussa Blêmetougre :
🥰
2025-10-17 09:56:58
0
user31714543425015
MD Nirav Shaikh :
😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭
2025-10-12 18:29:57
0
user31714543425015
MD Nirav Shaikh :
🤲🤲🤲🤲🤲
2025-10-12 18:29:51
0
To see more videos from user @mallan.amadou.nas, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Nigeria’s Fragmentation Debate: A “South Sudan Formula” Perspective 🌍 Background Nigeria, Africa’s most populous country, is a mosaic of ethnic, religious, and cultural identities. The Middle Belt serves as a transition zone between the Muslim-majority North and Christian-majority South, hosting dozens of minority groups with diverse languages and traditions. Meanwhile, the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) continue to push for independence through nonviolent advocacy, citing historical grievances from the Nigerian Civil War and ongoing marginalization. ⚖️ The “South Sudan Formula” The idea of applying a South Sudan-style partition to Nigeria suggests dividing the country into two or more sovereign entities to reduce ethno-religious conflict. In this hypothetical model: - Yoruba, North West, and North East would form one government, reflecting shared political and religious alignments. - Biafra and the Middle Belt would constitute another entity, emphasizing Christian identity and minority rights. This mirrors South Sudan’s 2011 independence, which was intended to resolve decades of religious and ethnic conflict with Sudan. However, South Sudan’s subsequent instability raises questions about whether partition truly guarantees peace. 🔑 Key Considerations - Religious Identity: The North is predominantly Muslim, while the Middle Belt and South (including Biafra) are largely Christian. Partition advocates argue this could reduce sectarian violence. - Ethnic Complexity: Nigeria’s diversity is far greater than Sudan’s. The Middle Belt alone contains dozens of ethnic groups, making neat divisions difficult. - Separatist Agitations: IPOB’s push for Biafra independence reflects long-standing grievances. Their nonviolent approach contrasts with the militarized state response, which has deepened mistrust. - Risks of Fragmentation: South Sudan’s experience shows that new states can face internal divisions, economic hardship, and governance crises. Nigeria could risk similar instability if partition is pursued without robust frameworks for cooperation. 📌 Implications - Political: Partition could reshape West Africa’s geopolitics, potentially destabilizing ECOWAS and regional trade. - Humanitarian: Advocates frame it as a solution to what they describe as “Christian genocide,” but critics warn it could trigger mass displacement and renewed conflict. - Diplomatic: The U.S. has not officially endorsed such a plan. Any external involvement would be highly controversial, given Nigeria’s sovereignty and strategic importance. --- ✍️ Conclusion While the “South Sudan formula” is an evocative idea, Nigeria’s complexity makes partition a risky and uncertain solution. The real challenge lies in building inclusive governance, protecting minority rights, and addressing religious violence without dismantling the state. Movements like IPOB and Middle Belt advocacy highlight the urgency of dialogue, but history warns that fragmentation may not deliver the peace many hope for.  #NigeriaDebate    #SouthSudanFormula    #BiafraVoices   -#MiddleBeltMatters    #UnityOrDivision
Nigeria’s Fragmentation Debate: A “South Sudan Formula” Perspective 🌍 Background Nigeria, Africa’s most populous country, is a mosaic of ethnic, religious, and cultural identities. The Middle Belt serves as a transition zone between the Muslim-majority North and Christian-majority South, hosting dozens of minority groups with diverse languages and traditions. Meanwhile, the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) continue to push for independence through nonviolent advocacy, citing historical grievances from the Nigerian Civil War and ongoing marginalization. ⚖️ The “South Sudan Formula” The idea of applying a South Sudan-style partition to Nigeria suggests dividing the country into two or more sovereign entities to reduce ethno-religious conflict. In this hypothetical model: - Yoruba, North West, and North East would form one government, reflecting shared political and religious alignments. - Biafra and the Middle Belt would constitute another entity, emphasizing Christian identity and minority rights. This mirrors South Sudan’s 2011 independence, which was intended to resolve decades of religious and ethnic conflict with Sudan. However, South Sudan’s subsequent instability raises questions about whether partition truly guarantees peace. 🔑 Key Considerations - Religious Identity: The North is predominantly Muslim, while the Middle Belt and South (including Biafra) are largely Christian. Partition advocates argue this could reduce sectarian violence. - Ethnic Complexity: Nigeria’s diversity is far greater than Sudan’s. The Middle Belt alone contains dozens of ethnic groups, making neat divisions difficult. - Separatist Agitations: IPOB’s push for Biafra independence reflects long-standing grievances. Their nonviolent approach contrasts with the militarized state response, which has deepened mistrust. - Risks of Fragmentation: South Sudan’s experience shows that new states can face internal divisions, economic hardship, and governance crises. Nigeria could risk similar instability if partition is pursued without robust frameworks for cooperation. 📌 Implications - Political: Partition could reshape West Africa’s geopolitics, potentially destabilizing ECOWAS and regional trade. - Humanitarian: Advocates frame it as a solution to what they describe as “Christian genocide,” but critics warn it could trigger mass displacement and renewed conflict. - Diplomatic: The U.S. has not officially endorsed such a plan. Any external involvement would be highly controversial, given Nigeria’s sovereignty and strategic importance. --- ✍️ Conclusion While the “South Sudan formula” is an evocative idea, Nigeria’s complexity makes partition a risky and uncertain solution. The real challenge lies in building inclusive governance, protecting minority rights, and addressing religious violence without dismantling the state. Movements like IPOB and Middle Belt advocacy highlight the urgency of dialogue, but history warns that fragmentation may not deliver the peace many hope for. #NigeriaDebate #SouthSudanFormula #BiafraVoices -#MiddleBeltMatters #UnityOrDivision

About