@asnita.p:

As🦋

Open In TikTok:

Region: MY

Saturday 11 October 2025 08:01:42 GMT

365

63

0

4

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (0.82MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (0.82MB) Watermark .mp4 (1.65MB) Music .mp3

Comments

There are no more comments for this video.

To see more videos from user @asnita.p, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

I Gotta Be Stopped‼️💥😂 #tiktoklive #crashout #entertainment #livehighlights

I Gotta Be Stopped‼️💥😂 #tiktoklive #crashout #entertainment #livehighlights

😌🕊️ #tiktokbdofficial #onlyc2k #viral #bd #bdtiktokofficial #tiktok #viralvideo @#foryou

😌🕊️ #tiktokbdofficial #onlyc2k #viral #bd #bdtiktokofficial #tiktok #viralvideo @#foryou

#اوعدك كان حظوري مسبب ازعاج #

#اوعدك كان حظوري مسبب ازعاج #

Cn los d haikyuu? 🫦 . . . . . . #tsukishima #tsukishimakei #kei #keitsukishima #tsukishimaedit #haikyuu #haikyuuedits #haikyuuedit #fyp #terapiadechoque

Cn los d haikyuu? 🫦 . . . . . . #tsukishima #tsukishimakei #kei #keitsukishima #tsukishimaedit #haikyuu #haikyuuedits #haikyuuedit #fyp #terapiadechoque

Veteran journalist Divakar Shah today issued a dramatic warning that both his personal safety and the security of the nation are at risk, and said he possesses video material he believes exposes those threats. Shah told colleagues and media contacts that publishing the footage could put his life in immediate danger. “I believe my life is in danger,” Shah said. “The country is also in very danger. I have some videos about it — if I publish these videos, I am going to be killed by someone.” His comments, shared with reporters and media organisations, raise urgent questions about the nature of the evidence he holds and the level of risk facing journalists and whistleblowers in the country. What Shah says he has Shah claims to possess video recordings that, in his assessment, reveal serious wrongdoing and threats to national security. He has not yet released the footage publicly, citing fear for his life. According to Shah, the material implicates powerful interests and — if made public — could provoke violent reprisals against him. At present Shah has not publicly detailed the content of the videos, nor has he provided copies to an independent third party or to law-enforcement agencies for safekeeping. Multiple attempts to reach Shah for further clarification were unsuccessful at the time of reporting. Reactions and concerns Shah’s statement has sparked concern among press freedom advocates, civil society groups and opposition figures, many of whom called for immediate protection measures and an independent inquiry. “Any journalist who claims to hold evidence of wrongdoing and fears for their life must be afforded protection and a transparent, impartial investigation,” said one rights advocate who declined to be named. Media organisations also urged authorities to investigate Shah’s claims promptly and to ensure his safety. “The state has an obligation to protect journalists and to investigate credible allegations of threats or attempts to silence the press,” a spokesperson for a national journalists’ union said. Why this matters Journalists who claim to possess sensitive information often face heightened risk. When those claims include threats of violence tied to the publication of material, they strike at the heart of press freedom and the public’s right to know. The potential chilling effect — where other reporters refrain from reporting for fear of retaliation — can have broad consequences for transparency and democratic accountability. Shah’s assertion that the country itself is “in very danger” suggests the videos may, in his view, reveal institutional weaknesses, security failures, or conduct that could destabilise public confidence. Until the footage is verified by independent parties, however, the public must rely on official investigations to determine the accuracy and significance of his claims. Calls for immediate action Several concrete steps are being urged by journalists and rights organisations in response to Shah’s warning: Immediate protection for Divakar Shah. Authorities should assess the immediacy of the threat and provide appropriate security measures — whether police protection, safe accommodation, or other safeguards. Secure preservation of evidence. Shah should be encouraged to deposit copies of the footage with trusted, independent parties (for example, an accredited media watchdog, a reputable international organisation, or a lawyer) to prevent tampering and ensure the material can be reviewed safely. Independent investigation. A transparent, impartial inquiry should examine both Shah’s claims and any credible threats against him. If the footage alleges criminal conduct, investigators should be empowered to pursue leads without political interference. Protection of press freedom. Authorities and political leaders must publicly affirm the right of journalists to report without fear of violence or unlawful retaliation and refrain #fyppppppppppppppppppppppp #fyp #news #nepal #ngo

Veteran journalist Divakar Shah today issued a dramatic warning that both his personal safety and the security of the nation are at risk, and said he possesses video material he believes exposes those threats. Shah told colleagues and media contacts that publishing the footage could put his life in immediate danger. “I believe my life is in danger,” Shah said. “The country is also in very danger. I have some videos about it — if I publish these videos, I am going to be killed by someone.” His comments, shared with reporters and media organisations, raise urgent questions about the nature of the evidence he holds and the level of risk facing journalists and whistleblowers in the country. What Shah says he has Shah claims to possess video recordings that, in his assessment, reveal serious wrongdoing and threats to national security. He has not yet released the footage publicly, citing fear for his life. According to Shah, the material implicates powerful interests and — if made public — could provoke violent reprisals against him. At present Shah has not publicly detailed the content of the videos, nor has he provided copies to an independent third party or to law-enforcement agencies for safekeeping. Multiple attempts to reach Shah for further clarification were unsuccessful at the time of reporting. Reactions and concerns Shah’s statement has sparked concern among press freedom advocates, civil society groups and opposition figures, many of whom called for immediate protection measures and an independent inquiry. “Any journalist who claims to hold evidence of wrongdoing and fears for their life must be afforded protection and a transparent, impartial investigation,” said one rights advocate who declined to be named. Media organisations also urged authorities to investigate Shah’s claims promptly and to ensure his safety. “The state has an obligation to protect journalists and to investigate credible allegations of threats or attempts to silence the press,” a spokesperson for a national journalists’ union said. Why this matters Journalists who claim to possess sensitive information often face heightened risk. When those claims include threats of violence tied to the publication of material, they strike at the heart of press freedom and the public’s right to know. The potential chilling effect — where other reporters refrain from reporting for fear of retaliation — can have broad consequences for transparency and democratic accountability. Shah’s assertion that the country itself is “in very danger” suggests the videos may, in his view, reveal institutional weaknesses, security failures, or conduct that could destabilise public confidence. Until the footage is verified by independent parties, however, the public must rely on official investigations to determine the accuracy and significance of his claims. Calls for immediate action Several concrete steps are being urged by journalists and rights organisations in response to Shah’s warning: Immediate protection for Divakar Shah. Authorities should assess the immediacy of the threat and provide appropriate security measures — whether police protection, safe accommodation, or other safeguards. Secure preservation of evidence. Shah should be encouraged to deposit copies of the footage with trusted, independent parties (for example, an accredited media watchdog, a reputable international organisation, or a lawyer) to prevent tampering and ensure the material can be reviewed safely. Independent investigation. A transparent, impartial inquiry should examine both Shah’s claims and any credible threats against him. If the footage alleges criminal conduct, investigators should be empowered to pursue leads without political interference. Protection of press freedom. Authorities and political leaders must publicly affirm the right of journalists to report without fear of violence or unlawful retaliation and refrain #fyppppppppppppppppppppppp #fyp #news #nepal #ngo

وين انا ؟ 🤣🤣🤣 #مقلب #ضحك #اصدقاء #اكسبلورexplore #ترند

وين انا ؟ 🤣🤣🤣 #مقلب #ضحك #اصدقاء #اكسبلورexplore #ترند

About

Robot

Legal

Privacy Policy