Dutch
Region: US
Wednesday 29 October 2025 01:46:17 GMT
303626
41020
696
2334
Music
Download
Comments
Tyler Shore :
NO on #1! it sets a dangerous precedent.
2025-10-29 07:18:19
1424
deena :
vote no on 2-5 because it takes city council out of the review process so new yorkers won't get any real representation in those decisions
2025-11-04 12:45:29
0
RDEM :
1-5 passed 😭
2025-11-06 14:57:48
0
Reese :
I voted no for everything.
2025-11-04 14:48:03
0
Fran :
I’m def a No on 1. Why would we give a private company constitutionally protected Forest Preserve for construction.
2025-10-29 12:15:41
862
Grace Johnson :
Dutch please relook at #1
2025-10-29 14:53:14
413
scoops troop :
1-4 no 5 and 6 yes
2025-11-04 14:49:18
0
Kyle :
will you turn on reposts
2025-11-04 00:56:32
0
murrayhilltortilla :
Affordable housing is so often a route for corruption
2025-11-04 12:50:33
0
E :
Wait thank you for the 2-4 thoughts!! I’ve been confused like what do you mean Landers AND Adams AND Hochul all support???
2025-10-29 02:10:19
1326
LeeAnna Faye :
Yes! Anything that takes power from the many and puts into the hands of the few is not okay.
2025-11-04 02:35:48
0
alg7611 :
As a city affordable housing worker, please vote yes on 2-4! It’s taking power away from Repiblicans like Vickie Paladino who don’t want any new housing in their districts.
2025-10-29 11:16:49
223
NiaChloe | The $hmoney Coach :
Im going no on #1…ion want natural preserves to be touched.
2025-10-29 09:28:52
288
wht :
2–4 had me messed up too. I hate that Eric left us with this problem!
2025-10-29 02:48:51
632
butt balls :
Hard no on one but I agree with everything else.
2025-11-03 17:54:19
0
user1650734228397 :
ONLY VOTE YES FOR PROPOSAL #5
2025-11-04 16:08:34
0
Em✨ :
thank you! the voter websites weren’t super in depth but your perspective is helpful. I think 1 should be controversial as well though. also for being too vague!
2025-10-30 23:09:57
0
Zoë :
I voted yes on all the housing proposals. Zohran’s housing advisor Cea Weaver and Brad lander both support them bcuz they’ll build more housing. What power do tenants have in the current system? Why do tenants care if more housing gets built?
2025-10-29 02:13:29
78
LipstickAndMartinis :
S L O W down.. what?
2025-10-29 02:07:39
29
WhimzyMeNYC :
#1 a YES???! If 1 is passed it will help to destroy natural green spaces!
2025-10-29 09:45:07
66
Jay :
NO ONE would be giving Mamdani this level of attention if mayoral elections were held during presidential election years.
2025-10-29 16:20:12
471
alisonroberts293 :
Totally agree with your reasoning, but I feel like proposal 4 is a little different. That one gives the mayor power where ONLY city council has it now. I’m still torn on 2 and 3, but I’m voting yes on 4
2025-10-29 19:34:50
0
Nadenka 🌿 :
I’m NO ❌ on 1. The precedent it will set is horrifying, and they haven’t even picked out this proposed 2500 acres we would get in exchange. There’s no way to know if it will equal the current land in terms of ecological quality. This isn’t just about the current facilities on that land, it’s about preserving the “forever wild” laws for future generations.
2025-10-29 14:56:10
198
matt buechele :
I know the housing ones feel like a toss up but I really feel like six should be an affirmative yes! Everything I’ve read said it leads to greater voter turnout when the elections line up!
2025-10-29 04:12:14
6
Kelsey :
Why yes on 1?
2025-10-29 02:18:52
0
To see more videos from user @dutchdeccc, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
