Language
English
عربي
Tiếng Việt
русский
français
español
日本語
한글
Deutsch
हिन्दी
简体中文
繁體中文
Home
How To Use
Language
English
عربي
Tiếng Việt
русский
français
español
日本語
한글
Deutsch
हिन्दी
简体中文
繁體中文
Home
Detail
@mian_rs: "#فساتين#فساتين_سهره#فساتين_سهرة#فساتين_زفاف_فساتين#ناعمه...
فساتين سهرات fashoin74/جده
Open In TikTok:
Region: SA
Monday 03 November 2025 20:11:46 GMT
14884
98
1
26
Music
Download
No Watermark .mp4 (
0.98MB
)
No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (
0.71MB
)
Watermark .mp4 (
1.01MB
)
Music .mp3
Comments
ابوريان :
🌺🌺🌺
2025-11-06 13:44:37
0
To see more videos from user @mian_rs, please go to the Tikwm homepage.
Other Videos
nature pool #bahdamanik air semula jadi #tourguidemedan #packagetripmedan
اضمدك يا حبيبي 🤍😔 #باسم_الكربلائي #حزن #وجع_مگتوم💔😔 #تصاميم_مرتضى🖤🌿 #مرتضى_🖤🌿
الله يجعلها امطار خير وبركه❤️ #اكسبلور #foryou #ينبع #ينبع_المزه #امطار
رُعب..عدلوا التفاعل..#a✦r #fypシ #fypシ #fyp #fyp #viral #viral #fyp #viral #fyp #viral #fyp #viral #fyp #viral #fyp #viral #fyp #viral #fyp #viral #fyp #viral #fyp #viral #fyp #viral #fyp #viral #fyp #viral #fyp
When official health pages start sewing recycled doubt about vaccines, the scientific question isn’t the problem. The communication and those in charge are. The real issue is that parents are already carrying the mental load of sorting real threats from imagined ones. When an authority adds uncertainty without new evidence, it drains that trust fast. Not because parents don’t understand science, but because mixed signals make it harder to tell what actually deserves attention. "Dr. Mona..new questions and studies are good!" Not when it's recycled and we don't see clinical concern: If they want to run new studies, fine. But those studies need to meet the exact same level of scrutiny and scientific standards they’re using to criticize the existing research. You don’t get to hold decades of strong evidence to one bar and then lower the bar for whatever comes next. Here’s the part that often gets missed: Autism research isn’t stuck. We understand far more about autism today than we did 10 or 20 years ago. Genetics, early brain development, and environmental factors within pregnancy explain far more than the timing of routine infant vaccines ever could. That’s why the scientific focus has shifted to prenatal health, early support, access to services, and reducing barriers to diagnosis. So instead of circling back to a question that’s already been answered many times and spending MONEY on this, families would benefit far more from: ➡️better access to early intervention ➡️reducing waitlists for developmental evaluations ➡️supporting caregivers ➡️improving prenatal and maternal health ➡️addressing environmental exposures that actually show biological pathways Those are real gaps that deserve attention. That’s also where science is moving — and where parents need support. For the time being as it relates to vaccines, I will not be using their resources as a primary referral. It is highly concerning this is on their website. If you want sources that stay grounded in evidence and don’t play politics with wording, I trust: @thepfid @ameracadpeds @childrensphila @vaccinateyourfamily @immunizeorg Clear science helps parents make steady choices. Confusing language doesn’t. I'm here to help you cut through that. Go to my website, link in bio, to get my newly UPDATED always free vaccine guide that breaks down the childhood schedule, why each vaccine matters, and the common questions parents ask me. What part of this CDC update raised your eyebrows?
About
Robot
Legal
Privacy Policy